linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/preempt: add PREEMPT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220203224048.GF20638@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Thu, 3 Feb 2022 23:40:48 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Cc:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, ardb@...nel.org,
        catalin.marinas@....com, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com, will@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] sched/preempt: add PREEMPT_DYNAMIC using static keys

On Mon, Dec 13, 2021 at 11:05:01PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:

> Anyone has an opinion on that? Can we do better on the arm64 static call side
> or should we resign ourself to using that static keys direction?

I don't hate this thing.