[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220203151912.87d47b82c1bc3f0d56be0e3a@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2022 15:19:12 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
Cc: <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexander Egorenkov <egorenar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>,
<cgroups@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] mm: memcg: synchronize objcg lists with a
dedicated spinlock
On Tue, 1 Feb 2022 14:33:04 -0800 Roman Gushchin <guro@...com> wrote:
> Alexander reported a circular lock dependency revealed by the mmap1
> ltp test:
> LOCKDEP_CIRCULAR (suite: ltp, case: mtest06 (mmap1))
>
> ...
>
> Fixes: bf4f059954dc ("mm: memcg/slab: obj_cgroup API")
I'm thinking it needs cc:stable. It sounds unlikely that we'll hit it
in real life, but lockdep splats are concerning and I expect downstream
kernel consumers will end up merging this anyway, for this reason.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists