linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel tree with the drm-intel-fixes tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220203105955.1cd61502@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Thu, 3 Feb 2022 10:59:55 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
        Intel Graphics <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>
Cc:     John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@...el.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@...el.com>,
        Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...el.com>,
        Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@...el.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-intel tree with the
 drm-intel-fixes tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the drm-intel tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h

between commit:

  b3f74938d656 ("drm/i915/pmu: Use PM timestamp instead of RING TIMESTAMP for reference")

from the drm-intel-fixes tree and commit:

  22ba60f617bd ("drm/i915: Move [more] GT registers to their own header file")

from the drm-intel tree.

I fixed it up (I just used the latter version) and can carry the fix as
necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped