linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/13] module: core code clean up

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yfsf2SGELhQ71Ovo@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date:   Wed, 2 Feb 2022 16:20:41 -0800
From:   Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To:     Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@...hat.com>,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
        Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@...e.de>
Cc:     cl@...ux.com, pmladek@...e.com, mbenes@...e.cz,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jeyu@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-modules@...r.kernel.org,
        live-patching@...r.kernel.org, atomlin@...mlin.com,
        ghalat@...hat.com, allen.lkml@...il.com, void@...ifault.com,
        joe@...ches.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/13] module: core code clean up

On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 09:32:01PM +0000, Aaron Tomlin wrote:
> Hi Luis,
> 
> As per your suggestion [1], this is an attempt to refactor and split
> optional code out of core module support code into separate components.
> This version is based on branch mcgrof/modules-next since a97ac8cb24a3/or
> modules-5.17-rc1. Please let me know your thoughts.
> 
> Changes since v1 [2]:

Thanks for all this work Aaron! Can you drop the RFC prefix,
rebase onto linus' latest tree (as he already merged my
modules-next, so his tree is more up to date), and submit again?

I'll then apply this to my modules-next, and then ask Christophe to
rebase on top of that.

Michal, you'd be up next if you want to go through modules-next.

Aaron, please Cc Christophe and Michal on your next respin.

Thanks!!

  Luis