linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] Broadcom STB PM PSCI extensions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YfuysSBnZbnMF4OC@FVFF77S0Q05N>
Date:   Thu, 3 Feb 2022 10:47:13 +0000
From:   Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        "maintainer:BROADCOM BCM7XXX ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Broadcom STB PM PSCI extensions

On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 07:54:17PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Hi all,

Hi Florian,

> This patch series contains the Broadcom STB PSCI extensions which adds
> some additional functions on top of the existing standard PSCI interface
> which is the reason for having the driver implement a custom
> suspend_ops.

I *really* don't like the idea of having non-standard PSCI extensions, because
it somewhat defeats the point of PSCI being a standard, and opens the door for
the zoo of mechanisms we had on 32-bit.

I think this needs a fair amount more explanation and justification.

> These platforms have traditionally supported a mode that is akin to
> ACPI's S2 with the CPU in WFI and all of the chip being clock gated
> which is entered with "echo standby > /sys/power/state". Additional a
> true suspend to DRAM as defined in ACPI by S3 is implemented with "echo
> mem > /sys/power/state".

Why isn't a combination of CPU_SUSPEND and SYSTEM_SUSPEND sufficient here?

What specifically *can't* you do with standard PSCI calls?

> These platforms also may have an external Broadcom PMIC chip which can
> cause the SoC to be powercycled assuming that we communicate that intent
> via a vendor specific PSCI SYSTEM_RESET2.
> 
> Since it is desirable to get any new functionality added to the kernel
> to be loadable as a module as part of shipping said products in a Google
> Kernel Image (GKI) environment, we need to export a couple of symbols from
> drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c.

I really don't want to export the guts of psci.c.

Thanks,
Mark.

> Thanks for your feedback.
> 
> Florian Fainelli (4):
>   firmware: psci: Export a couple of suspend symbols
>   soc: bcm: brcmstb: Make legacy PM code depend on !ARM_PSCI_FW
>   soc: bcm: brcmstb: Added support for PSCI system suspend operations
>   Documentation: ABI: Document Broadcom STB PSCI firmware files
> 
>  .../ABI/testing/sysfs-firmware-brcmstb        |  16 +
>  drivers/firmware/psci/psci.c                  |   9 +-
>  drivers/soc/bcm/brcmstb/Kconfig               |   4 +-
>  drivers/soc/bcm/brcmstb/pm/Makefile           |   3 +
>  drivers/soc/bcm/brcmstb/pm/pm-psci.c          | 315 ++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/psci.h                          |   2 +
>  include/linux/soc/brcmstb/brcmstb-smccc.h     |  84 +++++
>  7 files changed, 430 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-firmware-brcmstb
>  create mode 100644 drivers/soc/bcm/brcmstb/pm/pm-psci.c
>  create mode 100644 include/linux/soc/brcmstb/brcmstb-smccc.h
> 
> -- 
> 2.25.1
>