linux-kernel - [PATCH] mm/page_owner.c: record task name of process

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220203120040.2338-1-caoyixuan2019@email.szu.edu.cn>
Date:   Thu,  3 Feb 2022 20:00:40 +0800
From:   Yixuan Cao <caoyixuan2019@...il.szu.edu.cn>
To:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:     linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Yixuan Cao <caoyixuan2019@...il.szu.edu.cn>
Subject: [PATCH] mm/page_owner.c: record task name of process

I think in tracing page allocation behavior,
It is useful to record the task name of the process.

Although the current Page Owner has recorded the process ID,
When the process exits,
It is difficult to distinguish the specific function of this process,
This brings some inconvenience to debugging memory problems.

Therefore, add the task name information to the Page Owner,
So that users can clearly understand the task name of the process.
At the same time, with this information,
We can use tools/vm/page_owner_sort.c,
Provides more output modes for Page Owner.

Signed-off-by: Yixuan Cao <caoyixuan2019@...il.szu.edu.cn>
---
 mm/page_owner.c | 12 +++++++++---
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/page_owner.c b/mm/page_owner.c
index 99e360df9465..a8d666cd13ac 100644
--- a/mm/page_owner.c
+++ b/mm/page_owner.c
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ struct page_owner {
 	u64 ts_nsec;
 	u64 free_ts_nsec;
 	pid_t pid;
+	char task_name[TASK_COMM_LEN];
 };
 
 static bool page_owner_enabled = false;
@@ -163,6 +164,7 @@ static inline void __set_page_owner_handle(struct page_ext *page_ext,
 		page_owner->gfp_mask = gfp_mask;
 		page_owner->last_migrate_reason = -1;
 		page_owner->pid = current->pid;
+		strcpy(page_owner->task_name, current->comm);
 		page_owner->ts_nsec = local_clock();
 		__set_bit(PAGE_EXT_OWNER, &page_ext->flags);
 		__set_bit(PAGE_EXT_OWNER_ALLOCATED, &page_ext->flags);
@@ -229,6 +231,7 @@ void __folio_copy_owner(struct folio *newfolio, struct folio *old)
 		old_page_owner->last_migrate_reason;
 	new_page_owner->handle = old_page_owner->handle;
 	new_page_owner->pid = old_page_owner->pid;
+	strcpy(new_page_owner->task_name, old_page_owner->task_name);
 	new_page_owner->ts_nsec = old_page_owner->ts_nsec;
 	new_page_owner->free_ts_nsec = old_page_owner->ts_nsec;
 
@@ -339,9 +342,10 @@ print_page_owner(char __user *buf, size_t count, unsigned long pfn,
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	ret = snprintf(kbuf, count,
-			"Page allocated via order %u, mask %#x(%pGg), pid %d, ts %llu ns, free_ts %llu ns\n",
+			"Page allocated via order %u, mask %#x(%pGg), pid %d, task_name [%s], ts %llu ns, free_ts %llu ns\n",
 			page_owner->order, page_owner->gfp_mask,
 			&page_owner->gfp_mask, page_owner->pid,
+			page_owner->task_name,
 			page_owner->ts_nsec, page_owner->free_ts_nsec);
 
 	if (ret >= count)
@@ -415,9 +419,10 @@ void __dump_page_owner(const struct page *page)
 	else
 		pr_alert("page_owner tracks the page as freed\n");
 
-	pr_alert("page last allocated via order %u, migratetype %s, gfp_mask %#x(%pGg), pid %d, ts %llu, free_ts %llu\n",
+	pr_alert("page last allocated via order %u, migratetype %s, gfp_mask %#x(%pGg), pid %d, task_name [%s], ts %llu, free_ts %llu\n",
 		 page_owner->order, migratetype_names[mt], gfp_mask, &gfp_mask,
-		 page_owner->pid, page_owner->ts_nsec, page_owner->free_ts_nsec);
+		 page_owner->pid, page_owner->task_name,
+		 page_owner->ts_nsec, page_owner->free_ts_nsec);
 
 	handle = READ_ONCE(page_owner->handle);
 	if (!handle)
@@ -629,3 +634,4 @@ static int __init pageowner_init(void)
 	return 0;
 }
 late_initcall(pageowner_init)
+
-- 
2.31.1