linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv2 01/29] x86/tdx: Detect running as a TDX guest in early boot

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220203003209.bi6i4llc4jeouuh6@treble>
Date:   Wed, 2 Feb 2022 16:32:09 -0800
From:   Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To:     "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, mingo@...hat.com,
        bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...el.com, luto@...nel.org,
        peterz@...radead.org, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com,
        aarcange@...hat.com, ak@...ux.intel.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
        david@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, jgross@...e.com,
        jmattson@...gle.com, joro@...tes.org, knsathya@...nel.org,
        pbonzini@...hat.com, sdeep@...are.com, seanjc@...gle.com,
        tony.luck@...el.com, vkuznets@...hat.com, wanpengli@...cent.com,
        x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 01/29] x86/tdx: Detect running as a TDX guest in early
 boot

On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 02:14:59AM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 08:29:55PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Kirill,
> > 
> > On Mon, Jan 24 2022 at 18:01, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > 
> > Just a nitpick...
> > 
> > > +static bool tdx_guest_detected __ro_after_init;
> > > +
> > > +bool is_tdx_guest(void)
> > > +{
> > > +	return tdx_guest_detected;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +void __init tdx_early_init(void)
> > > +{
> > > +	u32 eax, sig[3];
> > > +
> > > +	cpuid_count(TDX_CPUID_LEAF_ID, 0, &eax, &sig[0], &sig[2],  &sig[1]);
> > > +
> > > +	if (memcmp(TDX_IDENT, sig, 12))
> > > +		return;
> > > +
> > > +	tdx_guest_detected = true;
> > > +
> > > +	setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_TDX_GUEST);
> > 
> > So with that we have two ways to detect a TDX guest:
> > 
> >    - tdx_guest_detected
> > 
> >    - X86_FEATURE_TDX_GUEST
> > 
> > Shouldn't X86_FEATURE_TDX_GUEST be good enough?
> 
> Right. We have only 3 callers of is_tdx_guest() in cc_platform.c
> I will replace them with cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_TDX_GUEST).

I had the same review comment before.  I was told that cc_platform_has()
was called before caps have been set up properly, so caps can't be
relied upon this early.

I'm not really convinced that's true.  Yes, early_identify_cpu() --
which runs after tdx_early_init() -- clears all boot_cpu_data's
capability bits to zero [*].

But shortly after that, early_identify_cpu() restores any "forced" caps
with a call to get_cpu_cap() -> apply_forced_caps().

So as far as I can tell, while it's subtle, it should work.  However, it
should be tested carefully ;-)


[ *] The memset() of boot_cpu_data seems unnecessary since it should
     already be cleared by the compiler when it gets placed in the
     .data..read_mostly section.

-- 
Josh