lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 3 Feb 2022 16:16:56 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net>
Cc:     "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
        kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        Avi Fishman <avifishman70@...il.com>,
        Tomer Maimon <tmaimon77@...il.com>,
        Tali Perry <tali.perry1@...il.com>,
        Patrick Venture <venture@...gle.com>,
        Nancy Yuen <yuenn@...gle.com>,
        Benjamin Fair <benjaminfair@...gle.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        OpenBMC Maillist <openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] pinctrl: nuvoton: npcm7xx: Use %zd printk format
 for ARRAY_SIZE()

On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 3:37 PM Jonathan Neuschäfer
<j.neuschaefer@....net> wrote:
>
> When compile-testing on 64-bit architectures, GCC complains about the
> mismatch of types between the %d format specifier and value returned by
> ARRAY_LENGTH(). Use %zd, which is correct everywhere.
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Fixes: 3b588e43ee5c7 ("pinctrl: nuvoton: add NPCM7xx pinctrl and GPIO driver")
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>

...

> -       dev_dbg(npcm->dev, "group size: %d\n", ARRAY_SIZE(npcm7xx_groups));
> +       dev_dbg(npcm->dev, "group size: %zd\n", ARRAY_SIZE(npcm7xx_groups));

Dunno how it's slipped away, but the proper specifier is %zu. I guess
that's what I also mentioned in reply to LKP's report.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ