linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 08/12] HID: core: for input reports, process the usages by priority list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220203143226.4023622-9-benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu,  3 Feb 2022 15:32:22 +0100
From:   Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>
To:     Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Ahelenia Ziemiańska 
        <nabijaczleweli@...ijaczleweli.xyz>,
        Ping Cheng <pinglinux@...il.com>,
        Aaron Armstrong Skomra <skomra@...il.com>,
        Jason Gerecke <killertofu@...il.com>,
        Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@...-t.net>
Cc:     linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 08/12] HID: core: for input reports, process the usages by priority list

Now that we have a list of fields/usages by priority order,
walk through that list to process the inputs instead of using the
order provided by the manufacturer.

Note that this changes the way we update the values in the struct
hid_field:
Previously, once a field was processed, we updated the new values.
Now we need to wait for the entire report to be processed to update
the values.

I don't think it will be an issue: because we were relying on the device
ordering, there were no guarantees to have a field stored before an other.
Which is why we introduced .report() in drivers to have those values
updated.

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>
---
 drivers/hid/hid-core.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
index b38528118642..db925794fbe6 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
@@ -1657,17 +1657,48 @@ static void hid_process_report(struct hid_device *hid,
 			       int interrupt)
 {
 	unsigned int a;
+	struct hid_field_entry *entry;
 	struct hid_field *field;
 
-	for (a = 0; a < report->maxfield; a++) {
-		field = report->field[a];
+	/* first retrieve all incoming values in data */
+	for (a = 0; a < report->maxfield; a++)
+		hid_input_fetch_field(hid, field = report->field[a], data);
+
+	if (!list_empty(&report->field_entry_list)) {
+		/* INPUT_REPORT, we have a priority list of fields */
+		list_for_each_entry(entry,
+				    &report->field_entry_list,
+				    list) {
+			field = entry->field;
+
+			if (field->flags & HID_MAIN_ITEM_VARIABLE)
+				hid_process_event(hid,
+						  field,
+						  &field->usage[entry->index],
+						  field->new_value[entry->index],
+						  interrupt);
+			else
+				hid_input_array_field(hid, field, interrupt);
+		}
 
-		hid_input_fetch_field(hid, field, data);
+		/* we need to do the memcpy at the end for var items */
+		for (a = 0; a < report->maxfield; a++) {
+			field = report->field[a];
 
-		if (field->flags & HID_MAIN_ITEM_VARIABLE)
-			hid_input_var_field(hid, field, interrupt);
-		else
-			hid_input_array_field(hid, field, interrupt);
+			if (field->flags & HID_MAIN_ITEM_VARIABLE)
+				memcpy(field->value, field->new_value,
+				       field->report_count * sizeof(__s32));
+		}
+	} else {
+		/* FEATURE_REPORT, regular processing */
+		for (a = 0; a < report->maxfield; a++) {
+			field = report->field[a];
+
+			if (field->flags & HID_MAIN_ITEM_VARIABLE)
+				hid_input_var_field(hid, field, interrupt);
+			else
+				hid_input_array_field(hid, field, interrupt);
+		}
 	}
 }
 
-- 
2.33.1