lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <de4ac81a-8e47-a75b-fd17-274680b8d29d@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 3 Feb 2022 22:51:36 +0800
From:   Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 026/239] f2fs: fix to do sanity check in is_alive()

On 2022/2/2 3:18, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
>> Oops, you're right, my bad.
>>
>>>
>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
>>>> @@ -589,6 +589,9 @@ static bool is_alive(struct f2fs_sb_info
>>>>    		set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_NEED_FSCK);
>>>>    	}
>>>> +	if (f2fs_check_nid_range(sbi, dni->ino))
>>>> +		return false;
>>>> +
>>>>    	*nofs = ofs_of_node(node_page);
>>>>    	source_blkaddr = datablock_addr(NULL, node_page, ofs_in_node);
>>>>    	f2fs_put_page(node_page, 1);
>>>
>>> AFAICT f2fs_put_page() needs to be done in the error path, too.
>>>
>>> (Problem seems to exist in mainline, too).
>>>
>>> Something like this?
>>
>> Could you please send a formal patch to f2fs mailing list for better review?
>>
>> Anyway, thanks a lot for the report and the patch!
> 
> I'm quite busy with other reviews at the moment. If you could submit a
> patch, it would be great, otherwise I'll get to it .. sometime.

I've submitted a patch, could you please take a look?

Thanks,

> 
> Best regards,
> 									Pavel
> 									

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ