lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <13a9d0fd-1b2c-b9c1-24a7-ff4fc5f4b8cc@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Thu, 3 Feb 2022 10:54:53 -0800
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>,
        Eugene Shalygin <eugene.shalygin@...il.com>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Denis Pauk <pauk.denis@...il.com>,
        Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [ASUS EC Sensors v8 0/3]

On 2/2/22 23:09, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> On čtvrtek 3. února 2022 4:48:53 CET Eugene Shalygin wrote:
>>>> Oleksandr sent an informal one already.
>>>>
>>>
>>> He wrote:
>>>
>>> "Given minor changes against v7, I think my "Tested-by:" should have been preserved."
>>>
>>> which doesn't mean he tested again, only that in his opinion
>>> the tags should have been preserved.
> 
> This is not what I meant, but my wording could be better, yes.
> 
> BTW, the changes were not of that kind to drop Tested-by: tag, really.
> 
>> Oleksandre, could you, please, let us know did you actually test the
>> v8 code and if so provide us with the Tested-by: tag?
> 
> Yes, I do run this version now, and it works fine for me.
> 
> Tested-by: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>
> 

Ok, based on that I'll apply the series on top of hwmon-next with your
Tested-by:.

Guenter

>>> That means that I am left with either accepting the series without any
>>> Tested-by: and/or Reviewed-by: tags, or I have to wait for some. I guess
>>> you are telling me that I won't get any additional tags, so I'll have to
>>> go in myself and have a closer look. I'll try to do that in the next week
>>> or two.
>>
>> Thank you, I understand now. If Oleksandr does not reply in a few days
>> I will send the update with another board
>> (fully duplicating information for its base variant), tested by a
>> Libre Hardware Monitor user.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
>> Best regards,
>> Eugene
>>
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ