linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/13] module: core code clean up

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220203194317.GC3113@kunlun.suse.cz>
Date:   Thu, 3 Feb 2022 20:43:17 +0100
From:   Michal Suchánek <msuchanek@...e.de>
To:     Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
Cc:     Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@...hat.com>,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>, cl@...ux.com,
        pmladek@...e.com, mbenes@...e.cz, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        jeyu@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-modules@...r.kernel.org, live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
        atomlin@...mlin.com, ghalat@...hat.com, allen.lkml@...il.com,
        void@...ifault.com, joe@...ches.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/13] module: core code clean up

Hello,

On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 04:20:41PM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 09:32:01PM +0000, Aaron Tomlin wrote:
> > Hi Luis,
> > 
> > As per your suggestion [1], this is an attempt to refactor and split
> > optional code out of core module support code into separate components.
> > This version is based on branch mcgrof/modules-next since a97ac8cb24a3/or
> > modules-5.17-rc1. Please let me know your thoughts.
> > 
> > Changes since v1 [2]:
> 
> Thanks for all this work Aaron! Can you drop the RFC prefix,
> rebase onto linus' latest tree (as he already merged my
> modules-next, so his tree is more up to date), and submit again?
> 
> I'll then apply this to my modules-next, and then ask Christophe to
> rebase on top of that.
> 
> Michal, you'd be up next if you want to go through modules-next.

Sounds like a good idea. When rebasing on top of 5.17-rc1 the only
conflict was on the module code.

Thanks

Michal