[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220204225507.4193113-1-paulmck@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2022 14:55:05 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: rcu@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH rcu 1/3] rcu/exp: Fix check for idle context in rcu_exp_handler
From: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>
For PREEMPT_RCU, the rcu_exp_handler() function checks
whether the current CPU is in idle, by calling
rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs(). However, rcu_exp_handler()
is called in IPI handler context. So, it should be checking
the idle context using rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle(). Fix this
by using rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle() instead of
rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs(). Non-preempt configuration
already uses the correct check.
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
---
kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
index 237a79989abae..1568c8ef185b2 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h
@@ -656,7 +656,7 @@ static void rcu_exp_handler(void *unused)
*/
if (!depth) {
if (!(preempt_count() & (PREEMPT_MASK | SOFTIRQ_MASK)) ||
- rcu_dynticks_curr_cpu_in_eqs()) {
+ rcu_is_cpu_rrupt_from_idle()) {
rcu_report_exp_rdp(rdp);
} else {
WRITE_ONCE(rdp->cpu_no_qs.b.exp, true);
--
2.31.1.189.g2e36527f23
Powered by blists - more mailing lists