[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BYAPR21MB12706B0DA2C2C7E972F13A81BF299@BYAPR21MB1270.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2022 23:52:10 +0000
From: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
To: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
"linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
Paul Rosswurm <paulros@...rosoft.com>,
Shachar Raindel <shacharr@...rosoft.com>,
"olaf@...fle.de" <olaf@...fle.de>, vkuznets <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next, 1/2] net: mana: Add handling of CQE_RX_TRUNCATED
> From: LKML haiyangz <lkmlhyz@...rosoft.com> On Behalf Of Haiyang Zhang
> Sent: Friday, February 4, 2022 2:46 PM
> ..
> The proper way to drop this kind of CQE is advancing rxq tail
> without indicating the packet to the upper network layer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists