lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yfzkm1CVNNRqHzd7@paasikivi.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Fri, 4 Feb 2022 10:32:27 +0200
From:   Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] device property: Don't split fwnode_get_irq*()
 APIs in the code

Hi Andy,

On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 02:56:13PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> New fwnode_get_irq_byname() landed after an unrelated function
> by ordering. Move fwnode_iomap(), so fwnode_get_irq*() APIs will
> go together.
> 
> No functional change intended.

I have no problem with the patch as such, but I have four patches moving
the implementation of this and other similar functions to OF and ACPI
frameworks. I moved what was here to OF/ACPI FWs as part of the fwnode
graph API implementation but some firmware type checks have crept back in
since that.

I'd prefer to prepend this patch to the rest of the set I have and get it
all merged through linux-pm tree, on the dependent patch reaches it.

-- 
Kind regards,

Sakari Ailus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ