lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220204091005.49407-1-chao@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri,  4 Feb 2022 17:10:05 +0800
From:   Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
To:     jaegeuk@...nel.org
Cc:     linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] f2fs: skip f2fs_preallocate_blocks() for overwrite case

There is potential hangtask happened during swapfile's writeback:

- loop_kthread_worker_fn		- do_checkpoint
  - kthread_worker_fn
   - loop_queue_work
    - lo_rw_aio
     - f2fs_file_write_iter
      - f2fs_preallocate_blocks
       - f2fs_map_blocks
					 - down_write
        - down_read
         - rwsem_down_read_slowpath
          - schedule

One cause is f2fs_preallocate_blocks() will always be called no matter
the physical block addresses are allocated or not.

This patch tries to check whether block addresses are all allocated with
i_size and i_blocks of inode, it's rough because blocks can be allocated
beyond i_size, however, we can afford skipping block preallocation in this
condition since it's not necessary to do preallocation all the time.

Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
---
v2:
- check overwrite case with i_size and i_blocks roughly.
 fs/f2fs/file.c | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
index cfdc41f87f5d..09565d10611d 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
@@ -4390,6 +4390,16 @@ static int f2fs_preallocate_blocks(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter,
 	int flag;
 	int ret;
 
+	/*
+	 * It tries to check whether block addresses are all allocated,
+	 * it's rough because blocks can be allocated beyond i_size,
+	 * however, we can afford skipping block preallocation since
+	 * it's not necessary all the time.
+	 */
+	if (F2FS_BLK_ALIGN(i_size_read(inode)) ==
+			SECTOR_TO_BLOCK(inode->i_blocks))
+		return 0;
+
 	/* If it will be an out-of-place direct write, don't bother. */
 	if (dio && f2fs_lfs_mode(sbi))
 		return 0;
-- 
2.32.0

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ