linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.15 10/32] lockd: fix failure to cleanup client locks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri,  4 Feb 2022 10:22:20 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...hat.com>,
        Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.15 10/32] lockd: fix failure to cleanup client locks

From: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@...hat.com>

commit d19a7af73b5ecaac8168712d18be72b9db166768 upstream.

In my testing, we're sometimes hitting the request->fl_flags & FL_EXISTS
case in posix_lock_inode, presumably just by random luck since we're not
actually initializing fl_flags here.

This probably didn't matter before commit 7f024fcd5c97 ("Keep read and
write fds with each nlm_file") since we wouldn't previously unlock
unless we knew there were locks.

But now it causes lockd to give up on removing more locks.

We could just initialize fl_flags, but really it seems dubious to be
calling vfs_lock_file with random values in some of the fields.

Fixes: 7f024fcd5c97 ("Keep read and write fds with each nlm_file")
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@...hat.com>
[ cel: fixed checkpatch.pl nit ]
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/lockd/svcsubs.c |    1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

--- a/fs/lockd/svcsubs.c
+++ b/fs/lockd/svcsubs.c
@@ -180,6 +180,7 @@ static int nlm_unlock_files(struct nlm_f
 {
 	struct file_lock lock;

+	locks_init_lock(&lock);
 	lock.fl_type  = F_UNLCK;
 	lock.fl_start = 0;
 	lock.fl_end   = OFFSET_MAX;