[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aa16191c1241473fbfd55995bbba37bd2ab4a41c.camel@perches.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2022 02:14:10 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: "David E. Box" <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>, hdegoede@...hat.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
srinivas.pandruvada@...el.com, mgross@...ux.intel.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 1/3] platform/x86: Add Intel Software Defined Silicon
driver
On Thu, 2022-02-03 at 21:30 -0800, David E. Box wrote:
> Intel Software Defined Silicon (SDSi) is a post manufacturing mechanism for
> activating additional silicon features. Features are enabled through a
> license activation process.
Why isn't this a user process and not a kernel one?
> V5
> - Update kernel version to 5.18 in API doc and copyrights to 2022.
> - Remove unneeded prototypes.
> - In binary attribute handlers where ret is only used for errors,
> replace,
> return (ret < 0) ? ret : size;
> with,
> return ret ?: size;
I think this style overly tricky.
Why not the canonical:
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
return size;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists