linux-kernel - [PATCH 20/23] KVM: MMU: pull CPU role computation to kvm_init

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220204115718.14934-21-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri,  4 Feb 2022 06:57:15 -0500
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     dmatlack@...gle.com, seanjc@...gle.com, vkuznets@...hat.com
Subject: [PATCH 20/23] KVM: MMU: pull CPU role computation to kvm_init_mmu

Do not lead init_kvm_*mmu into the temptation of poking
into struct kvm_mmu_role_regs, by passing to it directly
the CPU role.

Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 21 +++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 01027da82e23..6f9d876ce429 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -4721,11 +4721,9 @@ kvm_calc_tdp_mmu_root_page_role(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	return role;
 }
 
-static void init_kvm_tdp_mmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-			     const struct kvm_mmu_role_regs *regs)
+static void init_kvm_tdp_mmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, union kvm_mmu_role cpu_role)
 {
 	struct kvm_mmu *context = &vcpu->arch.root_mmu;
-	union kvm_mmu_role cpu_role = kvm_calc_cpu_role(vcpu, regs);
 	union kvm_mmu_page_role mmu_role = kvm_calc_tdp_mmu_root_page_role(vcpu, cpu_role);
 
 	if (cpu_role.as_u64 == context->cpu_role.as_u64 &&
@@ -4779,10 +4777,9 @@ static void shadow_mmu_init_context(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu *conte
 }
 
 static void kvm_init_shadow_mmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-				const struct kvm_mmu_role_regs *regs)
+				union kvm_mmu_role cpu_role)
 {
 	struct kvm_mmu *context = &vcpu->arch.root_mmu;
-	union kvm_mmu_role cpu_role = kvm_calc_cpu_role(vcpu, regs);
 	union kvm_mmu_page_role mmu_role;
 
 	mmu_role = cpu_role.base;
@@ -4874,20 +4871,19 @@ void kvm_init_shadow_ept_mmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool execonly,
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_init_shadow_ept_mmu);
 
 static void init_kvm_softmmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-			     const struct kvm_mmu_role_regs *regs)
+			     union kvm_mmu_role cpu_role)
 {
 	struct kvm_mmu *context = &vcpu->arch.root_mmu;
 
-	kvm_init_shadow_mmu(vcpu, regs);
+	kvm_init_shadow_mmu(vcpu, cpu_role);
 
 	context->get_guest_pgd     = get_cr3;
 	context->get_pdptr         = kvm_pdptr_read;
 	context->inject_page_fault = kvm_inject_page_fault;
 }
 
-static void init_kvm_nested_mmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_mmu_role_regs *regs)
+static void init_kvm_nested_mmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, union kvm_mmu_role new_role)
 {
-	union kvm_mmu_role new_role = kvm_calc_cpu_role(vcpu, regs);
 	struct kvm_mmu *g_context = &vcpu->arch.nested_mmu;
 
 	if (new_role.as_u64 == g_context->cpu_role.as_u64)
@@ -4928,13 +4924,14 @@ static void init_kvm_nested_mmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_mmu_role
 void kvm_init_mmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	struct kvm_mmu_role_regs regs = vcpu_to_role_regs(vcpu);
+	union kvm_mmu_role cpu_role = kvm_calc_cpu_role(vcpu, &regs);
 
 	if (mmu_is_nested(vcpu))
-		init_kvm_nested_mmu(vcpu, &regs);
+		init_kvm_nested_mmu(vcpu, cpu_role);
 	else if (tdp_enabled)
-		init_kvm_tdp_mmu(vcpu, &regs);
+		init_kvm_tdp_mmu(vcpu, cpu_role);
 	else
-		init_kvm_softmmu(vcpu, &regs);
+		init_kvm_softmmu(vcpu, cpu_role);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_init_mmu);
 
-- 
2.31.1