linux-kernel - [PATCH v7 10/17] KVM: s390: pv: add mmu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220204155349.63238-11-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Fri,  4 Feb 2022 16:53:42 +0100
From:   Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     borntraeger@...ibm.com, frankja@...ux.ibm.com, thuth@...hat.com,
        pasic@...ux.ibm.com, david@...hat.com, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, scgl@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH v7 10/17] KVM: s390: pv: add mmu_notifier

Add an mmu_notifier for protected VMs. The callback function is
triggered when the mm is torn down, and will attempt to convert all
protected vCPUs to non-protected. This allows the mm teardown to use
the destroy page UVC instead of export.

Signed-off-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  2 ++
 arch/s390/kvm/pv.c               | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index a22c9266ea05..1bccb8561ba9 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
 #include <linux/kvm.h>
 #include <linux/seqlock.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/mmu_notifier.h>
 #include <asm/debug.h>
 #include <asm/cpu.h>
 #include <asm/fpu/api.h>
@@ -921,6 +922,7 @@ struct kvm_s390_pv {
 	u64 guest_len;
 	unsigned long stor_base;
 	void *stor_var;
+	struct mmu_notifier mmu_notifier;
 };
 
 struct kvm_arch{
diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c b/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c
index f1e812a45acb..d3b8fd9b5b3e 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/pv.c
@@ -193,6 +193,21 @@ int kvm_s390_pv_deinit_vm(struct kvm *kvm, u16 *rc, u16 *rrc)
 	return -EIO;
 }
 
+static void kvm_s390_pv_mmu_notifier_release(struct mmu_notifier *subscription,
+					     struct mm_struct *mm)
+{
+	struct kvm *kvm = container_of(subscription, struct kvm, arch.pv.mmu_notifier);
+	u16 dummy;
+
+	mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
+	kvm_s390_cpus_from_pv(kvm, &dummy, &dummy);
+	mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
+}
+
+static const struct mmu_notifier_ops kvm_s390_pv_mmu_notifier_ops = {
+	.release = kvm_s390_pv_mmu_notifier_release,
+};
+
 int kvm_s390_pv_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, u16 *rc, u16 *rrc)
 {
 	struct uv_cb_cgc uvcb = {
@@ -234,6 +249,11 @@ int kvm_s390_pv_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, u16 *rc, u16 *rrc)
 		return -EIO;
 	}
 	kvm->arch.gmap->guest_handle = uvcb.guest_handle;
+	/* Add the notifier only once. No races because we hold kvm->lock */
+	if (kvm->arch.pv.mmu_notifier.ops != &kvm_s390_pv_mmu_notifier_ops) {
+		kvm->arch.pv.mmu_notifier.ops = &kvm_s390_pv_mmu_notifier_ops;
+		mmu_notifier_register(&kvm->arch.pv.mmu_notifier, kvm->mm);
+	}
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.34.1