[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220204020010.68930-5-jhubbard@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2022 18:00:09 -0800
From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
CC: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 4/5] mm: change lookup_node() to use get_user_pages_fast()
The purpose of calling get_user_pages_locked() from lookup_node() was to
allow for unlocking the mmap_lock when reading a page from the disk
during a page fault (hidden behind VM_FAULT_RETRY). The idea was to
reduce contention on the heavily-used mmap_lock. (Thanks to Jan Kara for
clearly pointing that out, and in fact I've used some of his wording
here.)
However, it is unlikely for lookup_node() to take a page fault. With
that in mind, change over to calling get_user_pages_fast(). This
simplifies the code, runs a little faster in the expected case, and
allows removing get_user_pages_locked() entirely, in a subsequent patch.
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
---
mm/mempolicy.c | 21 +++++++++------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index 028e8dd82b44..3f8dc58da3e8 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -907,17 +907,14 @@ static void get_policy_nodemask(struct mempolicy *p, nodemask_t *nodes)
static int lookup_node(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr)
{
struct page *p = NULL;
- int err;
+ int ret;
- int locked = 1;
- err = get_user_pages_locked(addr & PAGE_MASK, 1, 0, &p, &locked);
- if (err > 0) {
- err = page_to_nid(p);
+ ret = get_user_pages_fast(addr & PAGE_MASK, 1, 0, &p);
+ if (ret > 0) {
+ ret = page_to_nid(p);
put_page(p);
}
- if (locked)
- mmap_read_unlock(mm);
- return err;
+ return ret;
}
/* Retrieve NUMA policy */
@@ -968,14 +965,14 @@ static long do_get_mempolicy(int *policy, nodemask_t *nmask,
if (flags & MPOL_F_NODE) {
if (flags & MPOL_F_ADDR) {
/*
- * Take a refcount on the mpol, lookup_node()
- * will drop the mmap_lock, so after calling
- * lookup_node() only "pol" remains valid, "vma"
- * is stale.
+ * Take a refcount on the mpol, because we are about to
+ * drop the mmap_lock, after which only "pol" remains
+ * valid, "vma" is stale.
*/
pol_refcount = pol;
vma = NULL;
mpol_get(pol);
+ mmap_read_unlock(mm);
err = lookup_node(mm, addr);
if (err < 0)
goto out;
--
2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists