[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <682714ab20540935c972adfa9304482ba6999a0c.camel@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2022 09:01:07 -0800
From: "David E. Box" <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, hdegoede@...hat.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
srinivas.pandruvada@...el.com, mgross@...ux.intel.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 1/3] platform/x86: Add Intel Software Defined Silicon
driver
On Fri, 2022-02-04 at 06:01 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-02-04 at 05:23 -0800, David E. Box wrote:
> > On Fri, 2022-02-04 at 02:14 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2022-02-03 at 21:30 -0800, David E. Box wrote:
> []
> > > > - In binary attribute handlers where ret is only used for errors,
> > > > replace,
> > > > return (ret < 0) ? ret : size;
> > > > with,
> > > > return ret ?: size;
> > >
> > > I think this style overly tricky.
> > >
> > > Why not the canonical:
> > >
> > > if (ret < 0)
> > > return ret;
> > >
> > > return size;
> >
> > I can see not using the 2 parameter shortcut of the ternary operator, but
> > the
> > regular 3 parameter expression is easy to read for simple operations.
>
> The issue to me is it combines an error test and error return
> with the common return.
Ah, okay.
>
> it's also being used and avoided / naked with the similar
>
> return min(ret, size);
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20211116121014.1675-1-zhaoxiao@uniontech.com/T/
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists