linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] arm64: support PREEMPT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yf107Tg2cW0wR22+@arm.com>
Date:   Fri, 4 Feb 2022 18:48:13 +0000
From:   Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, ardb@...nel.org,
        bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, frederic@...nel.org,
        james.morse@....com, joey.gouly@....com, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, luto@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
        peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        valentin.schneider@....com, will@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/7] arm64: support PREEMPT_DYNAMIC

On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 03:05:57PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> This patch enables support for PREEMPT_DYNAMIC on arm64, allowing the
> preemption model to be chosen at boot time.
> 
> Specifically, this patch selects HAVE_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC_KEY, so that each
> preemption function is an out-of-line call with an early return
> depending upon a static key. This leaves almost all the codegen up to
> the compiler, and side-steps a number of pain points with static calls
> (e.g. interaction with CFI schemes). This should have no worse overhead
> than using non-inline static calls, as those use out-of-line trampolines
> with early returns.
> 
> For example, the dynamic_cond_resched() wrapper looks as follows (with
> the first `B` being replaced with a `NOP` when the function is
> disabled):
> 
> | <dynamic_cond_resched>:
> |        bti     c
> |        b       <dynamic_cond_resched+0x10>
> |        mov     w0, #0x0                        // #0
> |        ret
> |        mrs     x0, sp_el0
> |        ldr     x0, [x0, #8]
> |        cbnz    x0, <dynamic_cond_resched+0x8>
> |        paciasp
> |        stp     x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
> |        mov     x29, sp
> |        bl      <preempt_schedule_common>
> |        mov     w0, #0x1                        // #1
> |        ldp     x29, x30, [sp], #16
> |        autiasp
> |        ret
> 
> ... compared to the regular form of the function:
> 
> | <__cond_resched>:
> |        bti     c
> |        mrs     x0, sp_el0
> |        ldr     x1, [x0, #8]
> |        cbz     x1, <__cond_resched+0x18>
> |        mov     w0, #0x0                        // #0
> |        ret
> |        paciasp
> |        stp     x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
> |        mov     x29, sp
> |        bl      <preempt_schedule_common>
> |        mov     w0, #0x1                        // #1
> |        ldp     x29, x30, [sp], #16
> |        autiasp
> |        ret
> 
> Since arm64 does not yet use the generic entry code, we must define our
> own `sk_dynamic_irqentry_exit_cond_resched`, which will be
> enabled/disabled by the common code in kernel/sched/core.c. All other
> preemption functions and associated static keys are defined there.
> 
> Note that PREEMPT_DYNAMIC is `def bool y`, so this will default to
> enabled.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> Cc: Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@....com>
> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>

Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>