[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0h33afHe2tboa=5OEvEaqJAv730fL9YdXiGppUpdk+41w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2022 19:52:32 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] device property: Don't split fwnode_get_irq*()
APIs in the code
On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 2:41 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 11:41:19AM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 10:32:27AM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > > I'd prefer to prepend this patch to the rest of the set I have and get it
> > > all merged through linux-pm tree, on the dependent patch reaches it.
> >
> > I rebased mine on this patch and I was quite surprised to see it doesn't
> > conflict! So either way works fine for me.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
>
> Thank you, Sakari!
Patch applied as 5.18 material, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists