[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yf16AFzch6B4o/uv@linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2022 20:09:52 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
Steven Price <steven.price@....com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] arm64: mm: Make arch_faults_on_old_pte() check for
migratability
On 2022-02-04 18:55:17 [+0000], Catalin Marinas wrote:
>
> The patch looks alright but what's the plan with it? Does it go into the
> preempt-rt tree, mainline? It's not a fix to be queued now, so:
It would be nice if if it could go mainline, too.
> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists