linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] coresight: trbe: Move check for kernel page table isolation from EL0 to probe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ede31a2c-2d5b-88bd-9687-848eee2a0040@arm.com>
Date:   Fri, 4 Feb 2022 08:20:23 +0530
From:   Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
To:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
        Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>, coresight@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] coresight: trbe: Move check for kernel page table
 isolation from EL0 to probe



On 2/4/22 12:31 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Currently with the check present in the module initialisation, it shouts
> on all the systems irrespective of presence of coresight trace buffer
> extensions.
> 
> Similar to Arm SPE perf driver, move the check for kernel page table
> isolation from  EL0 to the device probe stage instead of the module
> initialisation so that it complains only on the systems that support TRBE.
> 
> Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
> Cc: Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>
> Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
> Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
> Cc: coresight@...ts.linaro.org
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
> ---
>  drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-trbe.c | 11 ++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> v1[1]->v2:
> 	- Added comment about trace capture being not possible with kernel
> 	  page table isolation
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220201122212.3009461-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-trbe.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-trbe.c
> index 276862c07e32..3e37a63cb7d2 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-trbe.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-trbe.c
> @@ -1423,6 +1423,12 @@ static int arm_trbe_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>  	int ret;
>  
> +	/* Trace capture is not possible with kernel page table isolation */
> +	if (arm64_kernel_unmapped_at_el0()) {
> +		pr_err("TRBE wouldn't work if kernel gets unmapped at EL0\n");
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +	}
> +
>  	drvdata = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*drvdata), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!drvdata)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
> @@ -1484,11 +1490,6 @@ static int __init arm_trbe_init(void)
>  {
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	if (arm64_kernel_unmapped_at_el0()) {
> -		pr_err("TRBE wouldn't work if kernel gets unmapped at EL0\n");
> -		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> -	}
> -
>  	ret = platform_driver_register(&arm_trbe_driver);
>  	if (!ret)
>  		return 0;
> 

Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>