linux-kernel - Re: [v6 PATCH] block: introduce block_rq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 5 Feb 2022 09:12:29 +0000
From:   Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@...dia.com>
To:     Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
CC:     "linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        "xiyou.wangcong@...il.com" <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
        "rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        "hch@...radead.org" <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [v6 PATCH] block: introduce block_rq_error tracepoint


>> since if I remember correctly we need to define a event class
>> instead of duplicating a tracepoint with similar reporting.
> 
> Very good point. I did overlook it. The original post did have disk
> name and didn't have cmd, now the two tracepoints look much more
> similar than the original post, so I agree the duplicate could be
> combined into an event class.
> 

I sent out a V7 with a prep patch and testlog keeping your
original authorship from this patch.

If you find anything wrong with that please send out V8 on the
top of V7.

>>
>> -ck
>>
>>