[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220205130628.150d250ee08c3143e9b5e0b2@intel.com>
Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2022 13:06:28 +1300
From: Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
<bp@...en8.de>, <dave.hansen@...el.com>, <luto@...nel.org>,
<peterz@...radead.org>,
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
<aarcange@...hat.com>, <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
<dan.j.williams@...el.com>, <david@...hat.com>, <hpa@...or.com>,
<jgross@...e.com>, <jmattson@...gle.com>, <joro@...tes.org>,
<jpoimboe@...hat.com>, <knsathya@...nel.org>,
<pbonzini@...hat.com>, <sdeep@...are.com>, <seanjc@...gle.com>,
<tony.luck@...el.com>, <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
<wanpengli@...cent.com>, <x86@...nel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 03/29] x86/tdx: Add __tdx_module_call() and
__tdx_hypercall() helper functions
> > Is declaration of __tdx_module_call() outside of CONFIG_INTEL_TDX_GUEST?
>
> No, it is defined within CONFIG_INTEL_TDX_GUEST. Why? Host side has to
> build their helper anyway.
>
Right. Fine to me.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists