lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220207120711.4070403-1-ari@tuxera.com>
Date:   Mon, 7 Feb 2022 14:07:11 +0200
From:   Ari Sundholm <ari@...era.com>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:     Ari Sundholm <ari@...era.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Anton Altaparmakov <anton@...era.com>
Subject: [PATCH] fs/read_write.c: Fix a broken signed integer overflow check.

The function generic_copy_file_checks() checks that the ends of the
input and output file ranges do not overflow. Unfortunately, there is
an issue with the check itself.

Due to the integer promotion rules in C, the expressions
(pos_in + count) and (pos_out + count) have an unsigned type because
the count variable has the type uint64_t. Thus, in many cases where we
should detect signed integer overflow to have occurred (and thus one or
more of the ranges being invalid), the expressions will instead be
interpreted as large unsigned integers. This means the check is broken.

Fix this by explicitly casting the expressions to loff_t.

Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Anton Altaparmakov <anton@...era.com>
Signed-off-by: Ari Sundholm <ari@...era.com>
---
 fs/read_write.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/read_write.c b/fs/read_write.c
index 0074afa7ecb3..64166e74adc5 100644
--- a/fs/read_write.c
+++ b/fs/read_write.c
@@ -1431,7 +1431,8 @@ static int generic_copy_file_checks(struct file *file_in, loff_t pos_in,
 		return -ETXTBSY;
 
 	/* Ensure offsets don't wrap. */
-	if (pos_in + count < pos_in || pos_out + count < pos_out)
+	if ((loff_t)(pos_in + count) < pos_in ||
+			(loff_t)(pos_out + count) < pos_out)
 		return -EOVERFLOW;
 
 	/* Shorten the copy to EOF */
-- 
2.20.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ