[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YgEkXARS160I9Ooe@lunn.ch>
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2022 14:53:32 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
Cc: Hans Schultz <schultz.hans@...il.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
kuba@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Hans Schultz <schultz.hans+netdev@...il.com>,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...dia.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/4] net: bridge: Add support for bridge port in
locked mode
> > + if (p->flags & BR_PORT_LOCKED) {
> > + fdb_entry = br_fdb_find_rcu(br, eth_hdr(skb)->h_source, vid);
> > + if (!(fdb_entry && fdb_entry->dst == p))
> > + goto drop;
>
> I'm not familiar with 802.1X so I have some questions:
Me neither.
>
> 1. Do we need to differentiate between no FDB entry and an FDB entry
> pointing to a different port than we expect?
And extending that question, a static vs a dynamic entry?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists