linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] pps: generators: pps_gen_parport: Switch to use module_parport

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YgEyoemcpsvC3bcI@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 7 Feb 2022 16:54:25 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@...eenne.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/1] pps: generators: pps_gen_parport: Switch to use
 module_parport_driver()

On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 03:33:10PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 04:19:44PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > Switch to use module_parport_driver() to reduce boilerplate code.

> You changed the functionality here :(
> 
> Currently if send_delay is too big, loading the module will fail.
> 
> Now it succeeds but binding to a device fails, that's a functional
> change.  Are you _SURE_ that is ok to do?

We already discussed that during v1 IIRC. And I told that it might even gain
additional flexibility for built-in case of the module.

> And why did you not mention any of this in the changelog text?  You
> passed this off as a mere code cleanup, no functional change :(

This is fair point. Since we end up in the same Q above. I will update
changelog in v5.

Thank you for review!

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko