[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1CE2BE2F-A47D-4EEF-809A-035775125D83@holtmann.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2022 16:48:09 +0100
From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
To: Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>
Cc: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
"Mark-YW Chen (陳揚文)"
<Mark-YW.Chen@...iatek.com>, Soul.Huang@...iatek.com,
YN.Chen@...iatek.com, Leon.Yen@...iatek.com,
Eric-SY.Chang@...iatek.com, Deren.Wu@...iatek.com,
km.lin@...iatek.com, robin.chiu@...iatek.com,
Eddie.Chen@...iatek.com, ch.yeh@...iatek.com,
posh.sun@...iatek.com, ted.huang@...iatek.com,
Eric.Liang@...iatek.com, Stella.Chang@...iatek.com,
Tom.Chou@...iatek.com, steve.lee@...iatek.com, jsiuda@...gle.com,
frankgor@...gle.com, jemele@...gle.com, abhishekpandit@...gle.com,
michaelfsun@...gle.com, mcchou@...omium.org, shawnku@...gle.com,
linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Bluetooth: mediatek: fix the conflict between mtk and
msft vendor event
Hi Sean,
> There is a conflict between MediaTek wmt event and msft vendor extension
> logic in the core layer since 145373cb1b1f ("Bluetooth: Add framework for
> Microsoft vendor extension") was introduced because we changed the type of
> mediatek wmt event to the type of msft vendor event in the driver.
>
> But the purpose we reported mediatek event to the core layer is for the
> diagnostic purpose with that we are able to see the full packet trace via
> monitoring socket with btmon. Thus, it is harmless we keep the original
> type of mediatek vendor event here to avoid breaking the msft extension
> function especially they can be supported by Mediatek chipset like MT7921
> , MT7922 devices and future devices.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>
> ---
> drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.h | 1 +
> drivers/bluetooth/btmtksdio.c | 9 +--------
> drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c | 5 -----
> 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.h b/drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.h
> index 8960a5f89d48..013850fd2055 100644
> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.h
> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btmtk.h
> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
> #define FIRMWARE_MT7668 "mediatek/mt7668pr2h.bin"
> #define FIRMWARE_MT7961 "mediatek/BT_RAM_CODE_MT7961_1_2_hdr.bin"
>
> +#define HCI_EV_WMT 0xe4
> #define HCI_WMT_MAX_EVENT_SIZE 64
>
> #define BTMTK_WMT_REG_WRITE 0x1
> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btmtksdio.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btmtksdio.c
> index 8e200e80d2f6..cbb09e1b823d 100644
> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btmtksdio.c
> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btmtksdio.c
> @@ -381,13 +381,6 @@ static int btmtksdio_recv_event(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
> struct hci_event_hdr *hdr = (void *)skb->data;
> int err;
>
> - /* Fix up the vendor event id with 0xff for vendor specific instead
> - * of 0xe4 so that event send via monitoring socket can be parsed
> - * properly.
> - */
> - if (hdr->evt == 0xe4)
> - hdr->evt = HCI_EV_VENDOR;
> -
> /* When someone waits for the WMT event, the skb is being cloned
> * and being processed the events from there then.
> */
> @@ -403,7 +396,7 @@ static int btmtksdio_recv_event(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
> if (err < 0)
> goto err_free_skb;
>
> - if (hdr->evt == HCI_EV_VENDOR) {
> + if (hdr->evt == HCI_EV_WMT) {
> if (test_and_clear_bit(BTMTKSDIO_TX_WAIT_VND_EVT,
> &bdev->tx_state)) {
> /* Barrier to sync with other CPUs */
> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
> index aefa0ee293f3..55ebab019d29 100644
> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
> @@ -2271,11 +2271,6 @@ static void btusb_mtk_wmt_recv(struct urb *urb)
> skb_put_data(skb, urb->transfer_buffer, urb->actual_length);
>
> hdr = (void *)skb->data;
> - /* Fix up the vendor event id with 0xff for vendor specific
> - * instead of 0xe4 so that event send via monitoring socket can
> - * be parsed properly.
> - */
> - hdr->evt = 0xff;
>
> /* When someone waits for the WMT event, the skb is being cloned
> * and being processed the events from there then.
please fix the reported issue by kernel test robot.
Regards
Marcel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists