[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48b9b944-732d-d187-af39-756d87eedfa9@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2022 11:40:03 -0600
From: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
To: "Bird, Tim" <Tim.Bird@...y.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Rae Moar <rmoar@...gle.com>,
Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
Cc: "rmr167@...il.com" <rmr167@...il.com>,
"guillaume.tucker@...labora.com" <guillaume.tucker@...labora.com>,
"dlatypov@...gle.com" <dlatypov@...gle.com>,
"kernelci@...ups.io" <kernelci@...ups.io>,
"kunit-dev@...glegroups.com" <kunit-dev@...glegroups.com>,
"linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] Documentation: dev-tools: clarify KTAP
specification wording
On 2/7/22 11:06 AM, Bird, Tim wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
>>
>> On 2/7/22 10:38 AM, Frank Rowand wrote:
>>> On 2/7/22 10:28 AM, frowand.list@...il.com wrote:
>>>> From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...y.com>
>>>>
>>>> Add the spec version to the title line.
>>>>
>>>> Explain likely source of "Unknown lines".
>>>>
>>>> "Unknown lines" in nested tests are optionally indented.
>>>>
>>>> Add "Unknown lines" items to differences between TAP & KTAP list
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...y.com>
>>>> ---
>>>
>>> Please do not apply this version (v2). I was working off the KTAP specification
>> ^^^^ TAP
>
> What???
I was looking at the proposed TAP v14 from:
branch 'git14' of https://github.com/isaacs/testanything.github.io.git
while David was looking at
branch 'tap-14-specification' of https://github.com/TestAnything/Specification/
David did not find the line type of "Anything else" in the TAP v14 he was looking
at, but did find it in TAP v13 (tap-version-13-specification.md) which is in
https://github.com/TestAnything/testanything.github.io
so my reference to TAP "Anything else" in the patch remains valid. The lack
of "Anything else" in the TAP v14 that David was looking at is why I initially
said to not apply this patch (v2).
>
>>> from a different github repo than I should have been referencing.
>>
>> OK to proceed with this version of the patch. I was referencing the proposed
>> TAP version 14, which is in a different github repo than the TAP version 13
>> specification. Everything in this patch is consistent with TAP version 13,
>> as well as the proposed TAP version 14.
>
> I'm confused by this message.
> Will there be a v3 of the patch, or are you saying to just apply the original v2 of
> this patch?
Sorry for the confusion. There is no longer a need for v3 of the patch, so it is
ok to apply v2 if it passes review.
>
> For the original (v2) of the patch, which I believe is
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220207162813.3091899-1-frowand.list@gmail.com/
>
> you can add a "Reviewed-by" from me.
> -- Tim
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists