| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <2138161e-bf6b-c22d-1c73-a93bc334da4f@xilinx.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 00:27:02 +0530
From: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@...inx.com>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
CC: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Ben Levinsky <ben.levinsky@...inx.com>,
Bill Mills <bill.mills@...aro.org>,
Sergei Korneichuk <sergei.korneichuk@...inx.com>,
<linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] drivers: remoteproc: Add Xilinx r5 remoteproc
driver
On 12/8/21 12:01 AM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 10:20:50PM -0800, Tanmay Shah wrote:
>> This driver enables r5f dual core Real time Processing Unit subsystem
>> available on Xilinx Zynq Ultrascale MPSoC Platform. RPU subsystem
>> (cluster) can be configured in different modes e.g. split mode in which
>> two r5f cores work independent of each other and lock-step mode in which
>> both r5f cores execute same code clock-for-clock and notify if the
>> result is different.
>>
>> The Xilinx r5 Remoteproc Driver boots the RPU cores via calls to the Xilinx
>> Platform Management Unit that handles the R5 configuration, memory access
>> and R5 lifecycle management. The interface to this manager is done in this
>> driver via zynqmp_pm_* function calls.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ben Levinsky <ben.levinsky@...inx.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@...inx.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig | 12 +
>> drivers/remoteproc/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c | 959 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 972 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
>> index f30d00a3aabe..27f66910d8d3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig
>> @@ -315,6 +315,18 @@ config TI_K3_R5_REMOTEPROC
>> It's safe to say N here if you're not interested in utilizing
>> a slave processor.
>>
>> +config XLNX_R5_REMOTEPROC
>> + tristate "Xilinx R5 remoteproc support"
>> + depends on PM && ARCH_ZYNQMP
>> + depends on ZYNQMP_FIRMWARE
>> + select RPMSG_VIRTIO
>> + select ZYNQMP_IPI_MBOX
>> + help
>> + Say y or m here to support Xilinx R5 remote processors via the remote
>> + processor framework.
>> +
>> + It's safe to say N if not interested in using RPU r5f cores.
>> +
>> endif # REMOTEPROC
>>
>> endmenu
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile
>> index bb26c9e4ef9c..334a8bed4c14 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile
>> @@ -35,3 +35,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ST_SLIM_REMOTEPROC) += st_slim_rproc.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_STM32_RPROC) += stm32_rproc.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_TI_K3_DSP_REMOTEPROC) += ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_TI_K3_R5_REMOTEPROC) += ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.o
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_XLNX_R5_REMOTEPROC) += xlnx_r5_remoteproc.o
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..c2167fd3869d
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,959 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +/*
>> + * ZynqMP R5 Remote Processor driver
>> + *
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <dt-bindings/power/xlnx-zynqmp-power.h>
>> +#include <linux/firmware/xlnx-zynqmp.h>
>> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>> +#include <linux/list.h>
>> +#include <linux/mailbox_client.h>
>> +#include <linux/mailbox/zynqmp-ipi-message.h>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_reserved_mem.h>
>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/remoteproc.h>
>> +#include <linux/skbuff.h>
>> +#include <linux/sysfs.h>
>> +
>> +#include "remoteproc_internal.h"
>> +
>> +/* settings for RPU cluster mode */
>> +enum zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode {
>> + SPLIT_MODE = 0, // RPU cluster mode when cores run as separate processor
>> + LOCKSTEP_MODE = 1, // cores execute same code in lockstep,clk-for-clk
>> + SINGLE_CPU_MODE = 2, // core0 is held in reset and only core1 runs
>> +};
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * struct mem_bank_data - Memory Bank description
>> + *
>> + * @addr: Start address of memory bank
>> + * @size: Size of Memory bank
>> + * @pm_domain_id: Power-domains id of memory bank for firmware to turn on/off
>> + * @bank_name: name of the bank for remoteproc framework
>> + */
>> +struct mem_bank_data {
>> + phys_addr_t addr;
>> + size_t size;
>> + enum pm_node_id pm_domain_id;
>> + char *bank_name;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static const struct mem_bank_data zynqmp_tcm_banks[] = {
>> + {0xffe00000UL, 0x10000UL, PD_R5_0_ATCM, "atcm0"}, /* TCM 64KB each */
>> + {0xffe20000UL, 0x10000UL, PD_R5_0_BTCM, "btcm0"},
>> + {0xffe90000UL, 0x10000UL, PD_R5_1_ATCM, "atcm1"},
>> + {0xffeb0000UL, 0x10000UL, PD_R5_1_BTCM, "btcm1"},
>> +};
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * struct zynqmp_r5_core - ZynqMP R5 core structure
>> + *
>> + * @dev: device of RPU instance
>> + * @np: device node of RPU instance
>> + * @tcm_bank_count: number TCM banks accessible to this RPU
>> + * @tcm_banks: array of each TCM bank data
>> + * @res_mem_count: number of Reserved Memory regions per core
>> + * @res_mem: array of reserved memory regions
>> + * @rproc: rproc handle
>> + * @pm_domain_id: RPU CPU power domain id
>> + */
>> +struct zynqmp_r5_core {
>> + struct device *dev;
>> + struct device_node *np;
>> + int tcm_bank_count;
>> + struct mem_bank_data *tcm_banks;
>> + int res_mem_count;
>> + struct reserved_mem *res_mem;
>> + struct rproc *rproc;
>> + enum pm_node_id pm_domain_id;
>> +};
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * struct zynqmp_r5_cluster - ZynqMP R5 cluster structure
>> + *
>> + * @dev: r5f subsystem cluster device node
>> + * @mode: cluster mode of type zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode
>> + * @core_count: number of r5 cores used for this cluster mode
>> + * @r5_cores: Array of r5 cores of type struct zynqmp_r5_core
>> + */
>> +struct zynqmp_r5_cluster {
>> + struct device *dev;
>> + enum zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode mode;
>> + int core_count;
>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_cores;
>> +};
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * zynqmp_r5_set_mode - set RPU operation mode
>> + *
>> + * set RPU operation mode
>> + *
>> + * Return: 0 for success, negative value for failure
>> + */
>> +static int zynqmp_r5_set_mode(struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core,
>> + enum zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode rpu_mode)
>> +{
>> + enum rpu_tcm_comb tcm_mode;
>> + int ret, reg_val;
>> +
>> + reg_val = (rpu_mode == LOCKSTEP_MODE ? 0 : 1);
>> +
>> + ret = zynqmp_pm_set_rpu_mode(r5_core->pm_domain_id, reg_val);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + pr_err("failed to set RPU mode\n");
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + tcm_mode = (rpu_mode == LOCKSTEP_MODE) ?
>> + PM_RPU_TCM_COMB : PM_RPU_TCM_SPLIT;
>> + ret = zynqmp_pm_set_tcm_config(r5_core->pm_domain_id, tcm_mode);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + pr_err("failed to configure TCM\n");
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_start
>> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
>> + *
>> + * Start R5 Core from designated boot address.
>> + *
>> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
>> + */
>> +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc)
>> +{
>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core = rproc->priv;
>> + enum rpu_boot_mem bootmem;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + if (!r5_core) {
>> + pr_err("can't get r5 core\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
> Please remove.
>
>> +
>> + bootmem = (rproc->bootaddr >= 0xFFFC0000) ?
>> + PM_RPU_BOOTMEM_HIVEC : PM_RPU_BOOTMEM_LOVEC;
> Some comments as to what is happening here would be appreciated.
>
>> +
>> + dev_dbg(r5_core->dev, "RPU boot addr 0x%llx from %s.", rproc->bootaddr,
>> + bootmem == PM_RPU_BOOTMEM_HIVEC ? "OCM" : "TCM");
>> +
>> + ret = zynqmp_pm_request_wake(r5_core->pm_domain_id, 1,
>> + bootmem, ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_NO);
>> + if (ret)
>> + pr_err("failed to start RPU = %d\n", r5_core->pm_domain_id);
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_stop
>> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
>> + *
>> + * Power down R5 Core.
>> + *
>> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
>> + */
>> +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc)
>> +{
>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core = rproc->priv;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = zynqmp_pm_force_pwrdwn(r5_core->pm_domain_id,
>> + ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_BLOCKING);
>> + if (ret)
>> + pr_err("failed to stop remoteproc RPU %d\n", ret);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_map
>> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
>> + * @mem: mem entry to map
>> + *
>> + * Callback to map va for memory-region's carveout.
>> + *
>> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
>> + */
>> +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_map(struct rproc *rproc,
>> + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem)
>> +{
>> + void __iomem *va;
>> +
>> + va = ioremap_wc(mem->dma, mem->len);
>> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(va))
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + mem->va = (void *)va;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_unmap
>> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
>> + * @mem: mem entry to unmap
>> + *
>> + * Unmap memory-region carveout
>> + *
>> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
>> + */
>> +static int zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_unmap(struct rproc *rproc,
>> + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem)
>> +{
>> + iounmap((void __iomem *)mem->va);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * add_mem_regions
>> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
>> + *
>> + * Construct rproc mem carveouts from carveout provided in
>> + * memory-region property
>> + *
>> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
>> + */
>> +static int add_mem_regions(struct rproc *rproc)
>> +{
>> + struct device *dev;
>> + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem;
>> + struct reserved_mem *rmem;
>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + r5_core = rproc->priv;
>> + dev = r5_core->dev;
>> +
>> + /* Register associated reserved memory regions */
>> + for (i = 0; i < r5_core->res_mem_count; i++) {
>> + rmem = &r5_core->res_mem[i];
> Indentation problem
>
>> + mem = rproc_mem_entry_init(dev, NULL,
>> + (dma_addr_t)rmem->base,
>> + rmem->size, rmem->base,
>> + zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_map,
>> + zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_unmap,
>> + rmem->name);
>> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(mem))
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + rproc_add_carveout(rproc, mem);
>> + }
> Not sure why this wasn't done in zynqmp_r5_get_mem_region_node()... That would
> prevent the need to keep a copy of the reserved memories in the zynqmp_r5_core
> structure.
>
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * zynqmp_r5_rproc_mem_unmap
>> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
>> + * @mem: mem entry to unmap
>> + *
>> + * Unmap TCM banks when powering down R5 core.
>> + *
>> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
>> + */
>> +static int tcm_mem_unmap(struct rproc *rproc, struct rproc_mem_entry *mem)
>> +{
>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
>> + int i;
>> + enum pm_node_id pm_domain_id;
>> +
>> + r5_core = rproc->priv;
>> + if (!r5_core) {
>> + pr_err("r5 core is not available\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + iounmap((void __iomem *)mem->va);
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < r5_core->tcm_bank_count; i++) {
>> + pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i].pm_domain_id;
>> + if (zynqmp_pm_release_node(pm_domain_id))
>> + pr_warn("can't turn off TCM bank %d", pm_domain_id);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * tcm_mem_map
>> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
>> + * @mem: mem entry to initialize the va and da fields of
>> + *
>> + * Given TCM bank entry, this callback will set device address for R5
>> + * running on TCM and also setup virtual address for TCM bank
>> + * remoteproc carveout.
>> + *
>> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
>> + */
>> +static int tcm_mem_map(struct rproc *rproc,
>> + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem)
> Indentation problem
>
>> +{
>> + void __iomem *va;
>> +
>> + va = ioremap_wc(mem->dma, mem->len);
>> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(va))
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + /* Update memory entry va */
>> + mem->va = (void *)va;
>> +
>> + /* clear TCMs */
>> + memset_io(va, 0, mem->len);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * The R5s expect their TCM banks to be at address 0x0 and 0x2000,
>> + * while on the Linux side they are at 0xffexxxxx.
>> + *
>> + * Zero out the high 12 bits of the address. This will give
>> + * expected values for TCM Banks 0A and 0B (0x0 and 0x20000).
>> + */
>> + mem->da &= 0x000fffff;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * TCM Banks 1A and 1B still have to be translated.
>> + *
>> + * Below handle these two banks' absolute addresses (0xffe90000 and
>> + * 0xffeb0000) and convert to the expected relative addresses
>> + * (0x0 and 0x20000).
>> + */
>> + if (mem->da == 0x90000 || mem->da == 0xB0000)
>> + mem->da -= 0x90000;
>> +
>> + /* if translated TCM bank address is not valid report error */
>> + if (mem->da != 0x0 && mem->da != 0x20000) {
>> + dev_err(&rproc->dev, "invalid TCM address: %x\n", mem->da);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int add_tcm_carveout_split_mode(struct rproc *rproc)
>> +{
>> + int i, num_banks, ret;
>> + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem;
>> + enum pm_node_id pm_domain_id;
>> + u32 bank_addr;
> phys_addr_t bank_addr;
>
>> + size_t bank_size = 0;
> No initialisation needed.
>
>> + char *bank_name;
>> + struct device *dev;
>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
>> +
>> + r5_core = (struct zynqmp_r5_core *)rproc->priv;
>> + if (!r5_core)
>> + return -EINVAL;
> Remove.
>
>> +
>> + dev = r5_core->dev;
>> +
>> + /* go through zynqmp banks for r5 node */
>> + num_banks = r5_core->tcm_bank_count;
>> + if (num_banks <= 0) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "need to specify TCM banks\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < num_banks; i++) {
>> + bank_addr = (u32)r5_core->tcm_banks[i].addr;
>> + bank_name = r5_core->tcm_banks[i].bank_name;
>> + bank_size = r5_core->tcm_banks[i].size;
>> + pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i].pm_domain_id;
>> +
>> + ret = zynqmp_pm_request_node(pm_domain_id,
>> + ZYNQMP_PM_CAPABILITY_ACCESS, 0,
>> + ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_BLOCKING);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to turn on TCM %d", pm_domain_id);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + dev_dbg(dev, "TCM carveout split mode %s addr=%x, size=0x%lx",
>> + bank_name, bank_addr, bank_size);
>> +
>> + /* add carveout */
>> + mem = rproc_mem_entry_init(dev, NULL, bank_addr,
>> + bank_size, bank_addr,
>> + tcm_mem_map, tcm_mem_unmap,
>> + bank_name);
> I'm pretty sure that if you run the sparse checker on this you will get a lot of
> angry warnings.
>
>
>> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(mem)) {
> Function rproc_mem_entry_init() does not return an error code.
>
>> + /* Turn off all TCM banks turned on before */
>> + do {
>> + pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i].pm_domain_id;
>> + ret = zynqmp_pm_release_node((u32)pm_domain_id);
> Here @pm_domain_id is casted as a u32 but it isn't above when calling
> zynqmp_pm_request_node(), and that despite both functions taking a "const u32
> node". Again, I'm sure the sparse checker will complain here.
>
>
>> + if (ret)
>> + dev_warn(dev,
>> + "fail to release node: %x, %x\n",
>> + (u32)pm_domain_id, ret);
>> + } while (i--);
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + }
>> +
>> + rproc_add_carveout(rproc, mem);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int add_tcm_carveout_lockstep_mode(struct rproc *rproc)
>> +{
>> + int i, num_banks, ret;
>> + struct rproc_mem_entry *mem;
>> + enum pm_node_id pm_domain_id;
>> + u32 bank_addr;
>> + size_t bank_size = 0;
> Same as above.
>
>> + char *bank_name;
>> + struct device *dev;
>> + struct platform_device *parent_pdev;
>> + struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster;
>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
>> +
>> + r5_core = (struct zynqmp_r5_core *)rproc->priv;
>> + if (!r5_core)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + dev = r5_core->dev;
>> + if (!dev) {
>> + pr_err("r5 core device unavailable\n");
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> + }
>> +
> Same as above.
>
>> + /* go through zynqmp banks for r5 node */
>> + num_banks = r5_core->tcm_bank_count;
>> + if (num_banks <= 0) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "need to specify TCM banks\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + bank_addr = (u32)r5_core->tcm_banks[0].addr;
>> + bank_name = r5_core->tcm_banks[0].bank_name;
>> + for (i = 0; i < num_banks; i++) {
>> + bank_size += r5_core->tcm_banks[i].size;
>> + pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i].pm_domain_id;
>> +
>> + ret = zynqmp_pm_request_node(pm_domain_id,
>> + ZYNQMP_PM_CAPABILITY_ACCESS, 0,
>> + ZYNQMP_PM_REQUEST_ACK_BLOCKING);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to turn on TCM %d", pm_domain_id);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> + }
> I know what is happening above but in 6 months it will all be gone from
> memory. Please add enough documentation for someone not familiar with the
> platform to understand why things are done that way. Here and throughout the
> driver.
>
>> +
>> + dev_dbg(dev, "TCM add carveout lockstep mode %s addr=0x%x, size=0x%lx",
>> + bank_name, bank_addr, bank_size);
>> +
>> + /* add carveout */
>> + mem = rproc_mem_entry_init(dev, NULL, bank_addr,
>> + bank_size, bank_addr,
>> + tcm_mem_map, tcm_mem_unmap,
>> + bank_name);
>> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(mem)) {
>> + for (i = 0; i < num_banks; i++) {
>> + pm_domain_id = r5_core->tcm_banks[i].pm_domain_id;
>> + ret = zynqmp_pm_release_node((u32)pm_domain_id);
>> + if (ret)
>> + dev_warn(dev,
>> + "fail to release node: %x ret: %x\n",
>> + (u32)pm_domain_id, ret);
>> + }
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + }
>> +
>> + rproc_add_carveout(rproc, mem);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * add_tcm_banks()
>> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
>> + *
>> + * Given R5 node in remoteproc instance
>> + * allocate remoteproc carveout for TCM memory
>> + * needed for firmware to be loaded
>> + *
>> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
>> + */
>> +static int add_tcm_banks(struct rproc *rproc)
>> +{
>> + struct device *dev;
>> + struct platform_device *parent_pdev;
>> + struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster;
>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
>> +
>> + r5_core = (struct zynqmp_r5_core *)rproc->priv;
>> + if (!r5_core)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + dev = r5_core->dev;
>> + if (!dev) {
>> + pr_err("r5 core device unavailable\n");
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> + }
> Remove.
>
>> +
>> + parent_pdev = to_platform_device(dev->parent);
>> + if (!parent_pdev) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "parent platform dev unavailable\n");
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> + }
>> +
>> + cluster = platform_get_drvdata(parent_pdev);
>> + if (!cluster) {
>> + dev_err(&parent_pdev->dev, "Invalid driver data\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
> Why not simply calling dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent) instead of going through the
> platform API?
>
>> +
>> + if (cluster->mode == SPLIT_MODE)
>> + return add_tcm_carveout_split_mode(rproc);
>> + else if (cluster->mode == LOCKSTEP_MODE)
>> + return add_tcm_carveout_lockstep_mode(rproc);
>> +
>> + dev_err(cluster->dev, "invalid cluster mode\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * zynqmp_r5_parse_fw()
>> + * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
>> + * @fw: ptr to firmware to be loaded onto r5 core
>> + *
>> + * When loading firmware, ensure the necessary carveouts are in remoteproc
>> + *
>> + * return 0 on success, otherwise non-zero value on failure
>> + */
>> +static int zynqmp_r5_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
>> +{
>> + int ret;
>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
>> + struct device *dev;
>> +
>> + r5_core = rproc->priv;
>> + if (!r5_core) {
>> + dev_err(&rproc->dev, "r5 core not available\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
> Same as above and throughout.
>
> I am done reviewing this set - the overall structure is sound but there is a
> fair amount of work to be done. There is no need to rush another revision as I
> won't have time to review it before the holidays. On that front, change
> _only_ the things I have commented on. We can address other issues as we move
> forward. Last but not least, please run the sparse checker on your work.
>
> Thanks,
> Mathieu
Hi Mathieu,
I am ready to post v3 in this patch series.
I have developed v3 based on rproc-next. However, when I rebased my work
on tip of linux-next branch,
I faced merge-conflicts.
What is preferred way to proceed in such case? Should I post my patch
based on rproc-next or linux-next?
Or any other way to proceed further?
>> +
>> + dev = r5_core->dev;
>> +
>> + ret = add_tcm_banks(rproc);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to get TCM banks, err %d\n", ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = add_mem_regions(rproc);
>> + if (ret)
>> + dev_warn(dev, "failed to get reserve mem regions %d\n", ret);
>> +
>> + ret = rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(rproc, fw);
>> + if (ret == -EINVAL) {
>> + /*
>> + * resource table only required for IPC.
>> + * if not present, this is not necessarily an error;
>> + * for example, loading r5 hello world application
>> + * so simply inform user and keep going.
>> + */
>> + dev_info(&rproc->dev, "no resource table found.\n");
>> + ret = 0;
>> + }
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct rproc_ops zynqmp_r5_rproc_ops = {
>> + .start = zynqmp_r5_rproc_start,
>> + .stop = zynqmp_r5_rproc_stop,
>> + .load = rproc_elf_load_segments,
>> + .parse_fw = zynqmp_r5_parse_fw,
>> + .find_loaded_rsc_table = rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table,
>> + .sanity_check = rproc_elf_sanity_check,
>> + .get_boot_addr = rproc_elf_get_boot_addr,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static void zynqmp_r5_print_dt_node_info(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster)
>> +{
>> + int i, j, k;
>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
>> +
>> + dev_dbg(cluster->dev, "Printing dt node info\n");
>> +
>> + pr_debug("cluster mode = %d\n", cluster->mode);
>> + pr_debug("r5f cluster in %s mode\n", (cluster->mode == 0) ? "SPLIT" :
>> + cluster->mode == 1 ? "LOCKSTEP" : "SINGLE_CPU");
>> + pr_debug("r5f num cores = %d\n", cluster->core_count);
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < cluster->core_count; i++) {
>> + r5_core = &cluster->r5_cores[i];
>> + if (!r5_core) {
>> + pr_err("can't get r5_core\n");
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> +
>> + pr_debug("r5 core %d nodes\n", i);
>> + pr_debug("TCM banks = %d\n", r5_core->tcm_bank_count);
>> + for (k = 0; k < r5_core->tcm_bank_count; k++) {
>> + pr_debug("tcm %d addr=0x%llx size=0x%lx, pm_id=%d, %s\n",
>> + k, r5_core->tcm_banks[k].addr,
>> + r5_core->tcm_banks[k].size,
>> + r5_core->tcm_banks[k].pm_domain_id,
>> + r5_core->tcm_banks[k].bank_name);
>> + }
>> +
>> + pr_debug("reserve mem regions = %d\n", r5_core->res_mem_count);
>> +
>> + for (j = 0; j < r5_core->res_mem_count; j++) {
>> + pr_debug("mem %d addr=0x%llx, size=0x%llx, name=%s\n",
>> + j, r5_core->res_mem[j].base,
>> + r5_core->res_mem[j].size,
>> + r5_core->res_mem[j].name);
>> + }
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core() - Probes ZynqMP R5 processor device node
>> + * this is called for each individual R5 core to
>> + * set up mailbox, Xilinx platform manager unique ID,
>> + * add to rproc core
>> + *
>> + * @r5_core: zynqmp_r5_core r5 core object to initialize
>> + *
>> + * Return: 0 for success, negative value for failure.
>> + */
>> +static int zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core(struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core)
>> +{
>> + int ret;
>> + struct rproc *r5_rproc;
>> + struct device *dev;
>> +
>> + dev = r5_core->dev;
>> +
>> + /* Set up DMA mask */
>> + ret = dma_set_coherent_mask(dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + /* Allocate remoteproc instance */
>> + r5_rproc = devm_rproc_alloc(dev, dev_name(dev), &zynqmp_r5_rproc_ops,
>> + NULL, sizeof(struct zynqmp_r5_core));
>> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(r5_rproc))
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + r5_rproc->auto_boot = false;
>> + r5_rproc->priv = r5_core;
>> +
>> + /* Add R5 remoteproc */
>> + ret = devm_rproc_add(dev, r5_rproc);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + pr_err("failed to add r5 remoteproc\n");
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster)
>> +{
>> + int tcm_bank_count, tcm_node;
>> + int i = 0, j;
>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
>> + const struct mem_bank_data *tcm = zynqmp_tcm_banks;
>> + struct device *dev = cluster->dev;
>> +
>> + /* ToDo: Use predefined TCM address space values from driver until
>> + * system-dt spec is not final fot TCM
>> + */
>> + tcm_bank_count = ARRAY_SIZE(zynqmp_tcm_banks);
>> +
>> + /* count per core tcm banks */
>> + tcm_bank_count = tcm_bank_count / cluster->core_count;
>> +
>> + /* r5 core 0 will use all of TCM banks in lockstep mode.
>> + * In split mode, r5 core0 will use 128k and r5 core1 will use another
>> + * 128k. Assign TCM banks to each core accordingly
>> + */
>> + tcm_node = 0;
>> + for (j = 0; j < cluster->core_count; j++) {
>> + r5_core = &cluster->r5_cores[j];
>> + r5_core->tcm_banks = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct mem_bank_data) *
>> + tcm_bank_count, GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(r5_core->tcm_banks))
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < tcm_bank_count; i++) {
>> + /* Use pre-defined TCM reg values.
>> + * Eventually this should be replaced by values
>> + * parsed from dts.
>> + */
>> + r5_core->tcm_banks[i].addr = tcm[tcm_node].addr;
>> + r5_core->tcm_banks[i].size = tcm[tcm_node].size;
>> + r5_core->tcm_banks[i].pm_domain_id = tcm[tcm_node].pm_domain_id;
>> + r5_core->tcm_banks[i].bank_name = tcm[tcm_node].bank_name;
>> + tcm_node++;
>> + }
>> +
>> + r5_core->tcm_bank_count = tcm_bank_count;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int zynqmp_r5_get_mem_region_node(struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core)
>> +{
>> + int res_mem_count, i;
>> + struct device *dev;
>> + struct device_node *np, *rmem_np;
>> + struct reserved_mem *rmem;
>> +
>> + dev = r5_core->dev;
>> +
>> + np = r5_core->np;
>> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(np)) {
>> + pr_err("invalid device node of r5 core\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + res_mem_count = of_property_count_elems_of_size(np, "memory-region",
>> + sizeof(phandle));
>> + if (res_mem_count <= 0) {
>> + dev_warn(dev, "failed to get memory-region property %d\n",
>> + res_mem_count);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + r5_core->res_mem = devm_kzalloc(dev,
>> + res_mem_count * sizeof(struct reserved_mem),
>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!r5_core->res_mem) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to allocate mem region memory\n");
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + }
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < res_mem_count; i++) {
>> + rmem_np = of_parse_phandle(np, "memory-region", i);
>> + if (!rmem_np)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + rmem = of_reserved_mem_lookup(rmem_np);
>> + if (!rmem) {
>> + of_node_put(rmem_np);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + memcpy(&r5_core->res_mem[i], rmem,
>> + sizeof(struct reserved_mem));
>> + of_node_put(rmem_np);
>> + }
>> +
>> + r5_core->res_mem_count = res_mem_count;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int zynqmp_r5_core_init(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster)
>> +{
>> + int ret, i;
>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
>> + struct device *dev = cluster->dev;
>> +
>> + ret = zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node(cluster);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "can't get tcm node, err %d\n", ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < cluster->core_count; i++) {
>> + r5_core = &cluster->r5_cores[i];
>> + if (!r5_core) {
>> + pr_err("invalid r5 core\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = zynqmp_r5_get_mem_region_node(r5_core);
>> + if (ret)
>> + dev_warn(dev, "memory-region prop failed %d\n", ret);
>> +
>> + ret = of_property_read_u32_index(r5_core->np, "power-domains",
>> + 1, &r5_core->pm_domain_id);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to get power-domains property\n");
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = zynqmp_r5_set_mode(r5_core, cluster->mode);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + ret = zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core(r5_core);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to init r5 core %d\n", i);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int zynqmp_r5_cluster_init(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster)
>> +{
>> + struct device *dev = cluster->dev;
>> + struct device_node *dev_node = dev_of_node(dev);
>> + struct device_node *child;
>> + struct platform_device *child_pdev;
>> + int core_count = 0, ret, i;
>> + enum zynqmp_r5_cluster_mode cluster_mode = LOCKSTEP_MODE;
>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_cores;
>> +
>> + ret = of_property_read_u32(dev_node, "xlnx,cluster-mode", &cluster_mode);
>> +
>> + /* on success returns 0, if not defined then returns -EINVAL,
>> + * In that case, default is LOCKSTEP mode
>> + */
>> + if (ret != -EINVAL && ret != 0) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "Invalid xlnx,cluster-mode property\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (cluster_mode == SINGLE_CPU_MODE) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "driver does not support single cpu mode\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + } else if ((cluster_mode != SPLIT_MODE &&
>> + cluster_mode != LOCKSTEP_MODE)) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "Invalid cluster mode\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + core_count = of_get_available_child_count(dev_node);
>> + if (core_count <= 0) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "Invalid number of r5 cores %d", core_count);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + } else if (cluster_mode == SPLIT_MODE && core_count != 2) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "Invalid number of r5 cores for split mode\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + } else if (cluster_mode == LOCKSTEP_MODE && core_count == 2) {
>> + dev_warn(dev, "Only r5 core0 will be used\n");
>> + core_count = 1;
>> + }
>> +
>> + r5_cores = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct zynqmp_r5_core) *
>> + core_count, GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(r5_cores)) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "can't allocate memory for cores\n");
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> + }
>> +
>> + i = 0;
>> + for_each_available_child_of_node(dev_node, child) {
>> + child_pdev = of_find_device_by_node(child);
>> + if (!child_pdev)
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> + r5_cores[i].dev = &child_pdev->dev;
>> + if (!r5_cores[i].dev) {
>> + pr_err("can't get device for r5 core %d\n", i);
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> + }
>> +
>> + r5_cores[i].np = dev_of_node(r5_cores[i].dev);
>> + if (!r5_cores[i].np) {
>> + pr_err("can't get device node for r5 core %d\n", i);
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> + }
>> +
>> + i++;
>> + if (i == core_count)
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> + cluster->mode = cluster_mode;
>> + cluster->core_count = core_count;
>> + cluster->r5_cores = r5_cores;
>> +
>> + ret = zynqmp_r5_core_init(cluster);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to init r5 core err %d\n", ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + zynqmp_r5_print_dt_node_info(cluster);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void zynqmp_r5_cluster_exit(void *data)
>> +{
>> + struct platform_device *pdev = (struct platform_device *)data;
>> +
>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
>> +
>> + pr_info("Exit r5f subsystem driver\n");
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe()
>> + *
>> + * @pdev: domain platform device for R5 cluster
>> + *
>> + * called when driver is probed, for each R5 core specified in DT,
>> + * setup as needed to do remoteproc-related operations
>> + *
>> + * Return: 0 for success, negative value for failure.
>> + */
>> +static int zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> + int ret;
>> + struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster;
>> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> +
>> + cluster = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*cluster), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(cluster))
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + cluster->dev = dev;
>> +
>> + ret = devm_of_platform_populate(dev);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to populate platform dev %d\n", ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* wire in so each core can be cleaned up at driver remove */
>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, cluster);
>> +
>> + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, zynqmp_r5_cluster_exit, pdev);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + ret = zynqmp_r5_cluster_init(cluster);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "Invalid r5f subsystem device tree\n");
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + dev_info(dev, "Xilinx r5f remoteproc driver probe success\n");
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Match table for OF platform binding */
>> +static const struct of_device_id zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match[] = {
>> + { .compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp-r5fss", },
>> + { /* end of list */ },
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match);
>> +
>> +static struct platform_driver zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_driver = {
>> + .probe = zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe,
>> + .driver = {
>> + .name = "zynqmp_r5_remoteproc",
>> + .of_match_table = zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match,
>> + },
>> +};
>> +module_platform_driver(zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_driver);
>> +
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Xilinx R5F remote processor driver");
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Xilinx Inc.");
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists