lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 7 Feb 2022 14:41:08 +0800
From:   "Chen, Rong A" <rong.a.chen@...el.com>
To:     Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
        kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc:     tangmeng <tangmeng@...ontech.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
        keescook@...omium.org, yzaikin@...gle.com, john.stultz@...aro.org,
        sboyd@...nel.org, kbuild-all@...ts.01.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] Re: [PATCH v2] kernel/time: move timer sysctls to
 its own file

Hi Luis,

Thanks for the feedback, we'll take a look.

Best Regards,
Rong Chen

On 2/2/2022 10:40 AM, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> These complaints are using and assuming and older kernel.
> 
>   Luis
> 
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 05:03:38AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>> Hi tangmeng,
>>
>> Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
>>
>> [auto build test ERROR on tip/timers/core]
>> [also build test ERROR on linus/master kees/for-next/pstore v5.17-rc1 next-20220128]
>> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
>> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
>> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
>>
>> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/tangmeng/kernel-time-move-timer-sysctls-to-its-own-file/20220128-165225
>> base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git 35e13e9da9afbce13c1d36465504ece4e65f24fe
>> config: arm64-randconfig-r026-20220127 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220129/202201290325.Jyor2i8O-lkp@intel.com/config)
>> compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.2.0
>> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
>>          wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
>>          chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>>          # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/8bd44d33085f8ab50523016cbdb0c918dc4b4f3c
>>          git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
>>          git fetch --no-tags linux-review tangmeng/kernel-time-move-timer-sysctls-to-its-own-file/20220128-165225
>>          git checkout 8bd44d33085f8ab50523016cbdb0c918dc4b4f3c
>>          # save the config file to linux build tree
>>          mkdir build_dir
>>          COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-11.2.0 make.cross O=build_dir ARCH=arm64 SHELL=/bin/bash kernel/time/
>>
>> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>>
>> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>
>>     kernel/time/timer.c: In function 'timer_sysctl_init':
>>>> kernel/time/timer.c:283:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'register_sysctl_init'; did you mean 'timer_sysctl_init'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>>       283 |         register_sysctl_init("kerneli/timer", timer_sysctl);
>>           |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>           |         timer_sysctl_init
>>     cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>>
>>
>> vim +283 kernel/time/timer.c
>>
>>     280	
>>     281	static int __init timer_sysctl_init(void)
>>     282	{
>>   > 283		register_sysctl_init("kerneli/timer", timer_sysctl);
>>     284		return 0;
>>     285	}
>>     286	#else
>>     287	#define timer_sysctl_init() do { } while (0)
>>     288	#endif
>>     289	static inline bool is_timers_nohz_active(void)
>>     290	{
>>     291		return static_branch_unlikely(&timers_nohz_active);
>>     292	}
>>     293	#else
>>     294	static inline bool is_timers_nohz_active(void) { return false; }
>>     295	#endif /* NO_HZ_COMMON */
>>     296	
>>
>> ---
>> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
>> https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
> _______________________________________________
> kbuild-all mailing list -- kbuild-all@...ts.01.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to kbuild-all-leave@...ts.01.org
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ