linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 11/23] KVM: MMU: do not recompute root level from kvm_mmu_role

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YgGY31hso29mbQ2E@google.com>
Date:   Mon, 7 Feb 2022 22:10:39 +0000
From:   David Matlack <dmatlack@...gle.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        seanjc@...gle.com, vkuznets@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/23] KVM: MMU: do not recompute root level from
 kvm_mmu_role_regs

On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 06:57:06AM -0500, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> The root_level can be found in the cpu_role (in fact the field
> is superfluous and could be removed, but one thing at a time).
> Since there is only one usage left of role_regs_to_root_level,
> inline it into kvm_calc_cpu_role.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 23 ++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> index f98444e1d834..74789295f922 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> @@ -253,19 +253,6 @@ static struct kvm_mmu_role_regs vcpu_to_role_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	return regs;
>  }
>  
> -static int role_regs_to_root_level(const struct kvm_mmu_role_regs *regs)
> -{
> -	if (!____is_cr0_pg(regs))
> -		return 0;
> -	else if (____is_efer_lma(regs))
> -		return ____is_cr4_la57(regs) ? PT64_ROOT_5LEVEL :
> -					       PT64_ROOT_4LEVEL;
> -	else if (____is_cr4_pae(regs))
> -		return PT32E_ROOT_LEVEL;
> -	else
> -		return PT32_ROOT_LEVEL;
> -}
> -
>  static inline bool kvm_available_flush_tlb_with_range(void)
>  {
>  	return kvm_x86_ops.tlb_remote_flush_with_range;
> @@ -4673,7 +4660,13 @@ kvm_calc_cpu_role(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_mmu_role_regs *regs)
>  		role.base.smep_andnot_wp = ____is_cr4_smep(regs) && !____is_cr0_wp(regs);
>  		role.base.smap_andnot_wp = ____is_cr4_smap(regs) && !____is_cr0_wp(regs);
>  		role.base.has_4_byte_gpte = !____is_cr4_pae(regs);
> -		role.base.level = role_regs_to_root_level(regs);
> +
> +		if (____is_efer_lma(regs))
> +			role.base.level = ____is_cr4_la57(regs) ? PT64_ROOT_5LEVEL : PT64_ROOT_4LEVEL;
> +		else if (____is_cr4_pae(regs))
> +			role.base.level = PT32E_ROOT_LEVEL;
> +		else
> +			role.base.level = PT32_ROOT_LEVEL;

Did you mean to drop the !CR0.PG case?

>  
>  		role.ext.cr0_pg = 1;
>  		role.ext.cr4_pae = ____is_cr4_pae(regs);
> @@ -4766,7 +4759,7 @@ static void init_kvm_tdp_mmu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  	context->get_guest_pgd = get_cr3;
>  	context->get_pdptr = kvm_pdptr_read;
>  	context->inject_page_fault = kvm_inject_page_fault;
> -	context->root_level = role_regs_to_root_level(regs);
> +	context->root_level = cpu_role.base.level;
>  
>  	if (!is_cr0_pg(context))
>  		context->gva_to_gpa = nonpaging_gva_to_gpa;
> -- 
> 2.31.1
> 
>