[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87czjzvztw.fsf@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2022 09:35:39 +0100
From: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
To: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Cc: alex.williamson@...hat.com, schnelle@...ux.ibm.com,
farman@...ux.ibm.com, pmorel@...ux.ibm.com,
borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com,
gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com, agordeev@...ux.ibm.com,
frankja@...ux.ibm.com, david@...hat.com, imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com,
vneethv@...ux.ibm.com, oberpar@...ux.ibm.com, freude@...ux.ibm.com,
thuth@...hat.com, pasic@...ux.ibm.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 14/30] vfio/pci: re-introduce CONFIG_VFIO_PCI_ZDEV
On Fri, Feb 04 2022, Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> This was previously removed as unnecessary; while that was true, subsequent
> changes will make KVM an additional required component for vfio-pci-zdev.
> Let's re-introduce CONFIG_VFIO_PCI_ZDEV as now there is actually a reason
> to say 'n' for it (when not planning to CONFIG_KVM).
Hm... can the file be split into parts that depend on KVM and parts that
don't? Does anybody ever use vfio-pci on a non-kvm s390 system?
[Apologies if that has been discussed before, this is my first look at
this series.]
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
> drivers/vfio/pci/Kconfig | 11 +++++++++++
> drivers/vfio/pci/Makefile | 2 +-
> include/linux/vfio_pci_core.h | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists