lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220207103803.229033443@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon,  7 Feb 2022 12:06:02 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Lang Yu <lang.yu@....com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.15 029/110] mm/kmemleak: avoid scanning potential huge holes

From: Lang Yu <lang.yu@....com>

commit c10a0f877fe007021d70f9cada240f42adc2b5db upstream.

When using devm_request_free_mem_region() and devm_memremap_pages() to
add ZONE_DEVICE memory, if requested free mem region's end pfn were
huge(e.g., 0x400000000), the node_end_pfn() will be also huge (see
move_pfn_range_to_zone()).  Thus it creates a huge hole between
node_start_pfn() and node_end_pfn().

We found on some AMD APUs, amdkfd requested such a free mem region and
created a huge hole.  In such a case, following code snippet was just
doing busy test_bit() looping on the huge hole.

  for (pfn = start_pfn; pfn < end_pfn; pfn++) {
	struct page *page = pfn_to_online_page(pfn);
		if (!page)
			continue;
	...
  }

So we got a soft lockup:

  watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#6 stuck for 26s! [bash:1221]
  CPU: 6 PID: 1221 Comm: bash Not tainted 5.15.0-custom #1
  RIP: 0010:pfn_to_online_page+0x5/0xd0
  Call Trace:
    ? kmemleak_scan+0x16a/0x440
    kmemleak_write+0x306/0x3a0
    ? common_file_perm+0x72/0x170
    full_proxy_write+0x5c/0x90
    vfs_write+0xb9/0x260
    ksys_write+0x67/0xe0
    __x64_sys_write+0x1a/0x20
    do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0
    entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae

I did some tests with the patch.

(1) amdgpu module unloaded

before the patch:

  real    0m0.976s
  user    0m0.000s
  sys     0m0.968s

after the patch:

  real    0m0.981s
  user    0m0.000s
  sys     0m0.973s

(2) amdgpu module loaded

before the patch:

  real    0m35.365s
  user    0m0.000s
  sys     0m35.354s

after the patch:

  real    0m1.049s
  user    0m0.000s
  sys     0m1.042s

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211108140029.721144-1-lang.yu@amd.com
Signed-off-by: Lang Yu <lang.yu@....com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 mm/kmemleak.c |   13 +++++++------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/mm/kmemleak.c
+++ b/mm/kmemleak.c
@@ -1403,7 +1403,8 @@ static void kmemleak_scan(void)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 	struct kmemleak_object *object;
-	int i;
+	struct zone *zone;
+	int __maybe_unused i;
 	int new_leaks = 0;
 
 	jiffies_last_scan = jiffies;
@@ -1443,9 +1444,9 @@ static void kmemleak_scan(void)
 	 * Struct page scanning for each node.
 	 */
 	get_online_mems();
-	for_each_online_node(i) {
-		unsigned long start_pfn = node_start_pfn(i);
-		unsigned long end_pfn = node_end_pfn(i);
+	for_each_populated_zone(zone) {
+		unsigned long start_pfn = zone->zone_start_pfn;
+		unsigned long end_pfn = zone_end_pfn(zone);
 		unsigned long pfn;
 
 		for (pfn = start_pfn; pfn < end_pfn; pfn++) {
@@ -1454,8 +1455,8 @@ static void kmemleak_scan(void)
 			if (!page)
 				continue;
 
-			/* only scan pages belonging to this node */
-			if (page_to_nid(page) != i)
+			/* only scan pages belonging to this zone */
+			if (page_zone(page) != zone)
 				continue;
 			/* only scan if page is in use */
 			if (page_count(page) == 0)


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ