linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.15 100/110] ext4: modify the logic of ext4_mb_new_blocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220207103805.775103847@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon,  7 Feb 2022 12:07:13 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Xin Yin <yinxin.x@...edance.com>,
        Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@...il.com>,
        Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>, stable@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH 5.15 100/110] ext4: modify the logic of ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple

From: Xin Yin <yinxin.x@...edance.com>

commit 31a074a0c62dc0d2bfb9b543142db4fe27f9e5eb upstream.

For now in ext4_mb_new_blocks_simple, if we found a block which
should be excluded then will switch to next group, this may
probably cause 'group' run out of range.

Change to check next block in the same group when get a block should
be excluded. Also change the search range to EXT4_CLUSTERS_PER_GROUP
and add error checking.

Signed-off-by: Xin Yin <yinxin.x@...edance.com>
Reviewed-by: Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@...il.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220110035141.1980-3-yinxin.x@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc: stable@...nel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/ext4/mballoc.c |   26 +++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -5753,7 +5753,8 @@ static ext4_fsblk_t ext4_mb_new_blocks_s
 	struct super_block *sb = ar->inode->i_sb;
 	ext4_group_t group;
 	ext4_grpblk_t blkoff;
-	int i = sb->s_blocksize;
+	ext4_grpblk_t max = EXT4_CLUSTERS_PER_GROUP(sb);
+	ext4_grpblk_t i = 0;
 	ext4_fsblk_t goal, block;
 	struct ext4_super_block *es = EXT4_SB(sb)->s_es;
 
@@ -5775,19 +5776,26 @@ static ext4_fsblk_t ext4_mb_new_blocks_s
 		ext4_get_group_no_and_offset(sb,
 			max(ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, group), goal),
 			NULL, &blkoff);
-		i = mb_find_next_zero_bit(bitmap_bh->b_data, sb->s_blocksize,
+		while (1) {
+			i = mb_find_next_zero_bit(bitmap_bh->b_data, max,
 						blkoff);
+			if (i >= max)
+				break;
+			if (ext4_fc_replay_check_excluded(sb,
+				ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, group) + i)) {
+				blkoff = i + 1;
+			} else
+				break;
+		}
 		brelse(bitmap_bh);
-		if (i >= sb->s_blocksize)
-			continue;
-		if (ext4_fc_replay_check_excluded(sb,
-			ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, group) + i))
-			continue;
-		break;
+		if (i < max)
+			break;
 	}
 
-	if (group >= ext4_get_groups_count(sb) && i >= sb->s_blocksize)
+	if (group >= ext4_get_groups_count(sb) || i >= max) {
+		*errp = -ENOSPC;
 		return 0;
+	}
 
 	block = ext4_group_first_block_no(sb, group) + i;
 	ext4_mb_mark_bb(sb, block, 1, 1);