[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <10e06ad6-e8bd-a6de-3334-c682125e7753@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 16:32:10 +0100
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Fbdev development list <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Noralf Trønnes <noralf@...nnes.org>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Linux PWM List <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] drm/tiny: Add driver for Solomon SSD1307 OLED
displays
Hello Mark,
On 2/8/22 16:18, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 04:10:49PM +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> On 2/8/22 15:19, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
>>> - "time ls" on the serial console (no files in the current directory,
>>> so nothing to print) increases from 0.86s to 1.92s, so the system is
>>> more loaded. As ssd1307fb relied on deferred I/O too, the slowdown
>>> might be (partly) due to redrawing of the visual artefacts
>>> mentioned above.
>
>> I was trying to first have the driver and then figure out how to optimize
>> it. For v3 I'm using regmap to access instead of the I2C layer directly.
>
>> I noticed that this is even slower but it makes the driver more clean and
>> allows to support both I2C and SPI (untested but will include it as a WIP).
>
> I wouldn't have expected regmap to add huge overhead relative to I2C,
> partly predicated on I2C being rather slow itself. There will be some
> overhead for concurrency protection and data marshalling but for I2C
> clocked at normal speeds it's surprising.
Thanks for chiming in. That's good to know, I'll investigate more then.
Probably I was wrongly blaming regmap while it was another change that
is causing the display to be refreshed at a slower rate than before.
Best regards,
--
Javier Martinez Canillas
Linux Engineering
Red Hat
Powered by blists - more mailing lists