[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ad8b8beb-85be-a0b2-57b3-d8e3b8acda51@amd.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 15:00:45 -0600
From: Terry Bowman <Terry.Bowman@....com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
Robert Richter <rrichter@....com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
sudheesh.mavila@....com,
"Shah, Nehal-bakulchandra" <Nehal-bakulchandra.Shah@....com>,
Basavaraj Natikar <Basavaraj.Natikar@....com>,
Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@....com>,
Mario Limonciello <Mario.Limonciello@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 9/9] i2c: piix4: Enable EFCH MMIO for Family 17h+
Hi Andy,
On 2/8/22 14:10, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 6:33 PM Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de> wrote:
>> On Sun, 30 Jan 2022 12:41:30 -0600, Terry Bowman wrote:
>
> ...
>
>>> +#define AMD_PCI_SMBUS_REVISION_MMIO 0x51
>>
>> I don't think that was worth a define. You only use the value once, in
>> a context where the symbolic name doesn't add much value IMHO.
>
> I don't remember the code context here, but it would be nice in such a
> case to convert this definition to a comment (if it's not crystal
> clear what this magic number is about).
>
>
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-piix4.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-piix4.c
index 239df17ce02b..218ed8efb83e 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-piix4.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-piix4.c
@@ -229,6 +229,13 @@ static void piix4_sb800_region_release(struct device *dev,
release_region(SB800_PIIX4_SMB_IDX, SB800_PIIX4_SMB_MAP_SIZE);
}
+static bool piix4_sb800_use_mmio(struct pci_dev *PIIX4_dev)
+{
+ return (PIIX4_dev->vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD &&
+ PIIX4_dev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_AMD_KERNCZ_SMBUS &&
+ PIIX4_dev->revision >= AMD_PCI_SMBUS_REVISION_MMIO);
+}
+
static int piix4_setup(struct pci_dev *PIIX4_dev,
const struct pci_device_id *id)
{
----
I added the context above. I'll add a comment in v5 to describe what and
why 0x51 is used.
Regards,
Terry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists