[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220208020441.3081162-5-liambeguin@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2022 21:04:34 -0500
From: Liam Beguin <liambeguin@...il.com>
To: liambeguin@...il.com, peda@...ntia.se, jic23@...nel.org,
andy.shevchenko@...il.com, lars@...afoo.de
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH v14 04/11] iio: afe: rescale: fix accuracy for small fractional scales
The approximation caused by integer divisions can be costly on smaller
scale values since the decimal part is significant compared to the
integer part. Switch to an IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO scale type in such
cases to maintain accuracy.
Signed-off-by: Liam Beguin <liambeguin@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
---
drivers/iio/afe/iio-rescale.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/afe/iio-rescale.c b/drivers/iio/afe/iio-rescale.c
index 63035b4bce5e..468e6c345bd1 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/afe/iio-rescale.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/afe/iio-rescale.c
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ int rescale_process_scale(struct rescale *rescale, int scale_type,
int *val, int *val2)
{
s64 tmp;
- s32 rem;
+ s32 rem, rem2;
u32 mult;
u32 neg;
@@ -44,9 +44,23 @@ int rescale_process_scale(struct rescale *rescale, int scale_type,
tmp = (s64)*val * 1000000000LL;
tmp = div_s64(tmp, rescale->denominator);
tmp *= rescale->numerator;
- tmp = div_s64(tmp, 1000000000LL);
+
+ tmp = div_s64_rem(tmp, 1000000000LL, &rem);
*val = tmp;
- return scale_type;
+
+ if (!rem)
+ return scale_type;
+
+ tmp = 1 << *val2;
+
+ rem2 = *val % (int)tmp;
+ *val = *val / (int)tmp;
+
+ *val2 = rem / (int)tmp;
+ if (rem2)
+ *val2 += div_s64((s64)rem2 * 1000000000LL, tmp);
+
+ return IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO;
case IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO:
case IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO:
mult = scale_type == IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO ? GIGA : MEGA;
--
2.35.1.4.g5d01301f2b86
Powered by blists - more mailing lists