linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 3/9] dt-bindings: memory: lpddr2: Add revision-id properties

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAODwPW-2othAhTC9a_joBdHScA86iqs-FkZJZDrK5LxrJm8F8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 7 Feb 2022 18:06:15 -0800
From:   Julius Werner <jwerner@...omium.org>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/9] dt-bindings: memory: lpddr2: Add revision-id properties

Apologies for only noticing this a couple of months too late... but
this patch added the same thing to the "jedec,lpddr2" bindings that
were previously added by
https://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg413733.html to
"jedec,lpddr3", but in a slightly incompatible manner. Should we
adjust it to make them consistent (two bytes in one property, rather
than a separate property for each)? Or is it too late to change that?