lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAAhV-H4t96wJZs50qjJVnFSHXv7n9YeaXPaV32AGvO2SASWmYw@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 10:14:08 +0800 From: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org> To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Maling list - DRI developers <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Xuefeng Li <lixuefeng@...ngson.cn>, Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/10] vgaarb: Rework default VGA device selection Hi, Bjorn, On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 1:59 AM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 04:46:33PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > > Op 31-01-2022 om 23:23 schreef Bjorn Helgaas: > > > [+to Maarten, Maxime, Thomas; beginning of thread: > > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220106000658.243509-1-helgaas@kernel.org] > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 06:06:48PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > >> From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com> > > >> > > >> Current default VGA device selection fails in some cases because part of it > > >> is done in the vga_arb_device_init() subsys_initcall, and some arches > > >> enumerate PCI devices in pcibios_init(), which runs *after* that. > > > Where are we at with this series? Is there anything I can do to move > > > it forward? > > > > I'm afraid that I don't understand the vga arbiter or the vga code > > well enough to review. > > > > Could you perhaps find someone who could review? > > > > I see Chen wrote some patches and tested, so perhaps they could? > > Huacai, any chance you could review this? I'm worried that this > series isn't going to go anywhere unless we can find somebody to > review it. I have reviewed and tested the whole series, it looks good to me (except the naming which has already changed). But I thought I cannot add a "Reviewed-by" because I was originally a co-developer. But if necessary, Reviewed-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn> Huacai > > Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists