linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 09/10] iommu/vt-d: Refactor dmar_insert_one_dev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 8 Feb 2022 12:55:07 +0800
From:   Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
        Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>, Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 09/10] iommu/vt-d: Refactor dmar_insert_one_dev_info()

On 2/8/22 2:27 AM, Jacob Pan wrote:
> Hi BaoLu,

Hi Jacob,
> 
> On Mon,  7 Feb 2022 14:41:41 +0800, Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
> wrote:
> 
>>   static void intel_iommu_release_device(struct device *dev)
>>   {
>> -	struct intel_iommu *iommu;
>> -
>> -	iommu = device_to_iommu(dev, NULL, NULL);
>> -	if (!iommu)
>> -		return;
>> -
>> -	dmar_remove_one_dev_info(dev);
>> +	struct device_domain_info *info = get_domain_info(dev);
>> +	unsigned long index = DEVI_IDX(info->segment, info->bus,
>> info->devfn);
>> +	xa_erase(&device_domain_array, index);
>> +	dev_iommu_priv_set(info->dev, NULL);
>>   	set_dma_ops(dev, NULL);
>> +	kfree(info);
> Now that info and sinfo are under RCU, should we use kfree_rcu?

Yes. We should use kfree_rcu.

Best regards,
baolu