linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: crypto: Convert Atmel AES to yaml

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7b787aee-ceea-d035-38b1-02ba0bcd3f21@canonical.com>
Date:   Tue, 8 Feb 2022 09:59:27 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
To:     Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
        robh+dt@...nel.org
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com,
        Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: crypto: Convert Atmel AES to yaml

On 08/02/2022 05:10, Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com wrote:
> Hi, Krzysztof,
> 
> On 2/7/22 17:56, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>>
>> On 07/02/2022 04:24, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
>>> Convert Atmel AES documentation to yaml format. With the conversion the
>>> clock and clock-names properties are made mandatory. The driver returns
>>> -EINVAL if "aes_clk" is not found, reflect that in the bindings and make
>>> the clock and clock-names properties mandatory. Update the example to
>>> better describe how one should define the dt node.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>
>>> ---
>>>  .../devicetree/bindings/crypto/atmel,aes.yaml | 65 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>  .../bindings/crypto/atmel-crypto.txt          | 20 ------
>>>  2 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/atmel,aes.yaml
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/atmel,aes.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/atmel,aes.yaml
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..f77ec04dbabe
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/atmel,aes.yaml
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
>>> +%YAML 1.2
>>> +---
>>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/crypto/atmel,aes.yaml#
>>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>>> +
>>> +title: Atmel Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) HW cryptographic accelerator
>>> +
>>> +maintainers:
>>> +  - Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>
>>> +
>>> +properties:
>>> +  compatible:
>>> +    const: atmel,at91sam9g46-aes
>>> +
>>> +  reg:
>>> +    maxItems: 1
>>> +
>>> +  interrupts:
>>> +    maxItems: 1
>>> +
>>> +  clocks:
>>> +    maxItems: 1
>>> +
>>> +  clock-names:
>>> +    const: aes_clk
>>> +
>>> +  dmas:
>>> +    items:
>>> +      - description: TX DMA Channel
>>> +      - description: RX DMA Channel
>>> +
>>> +  dma-names:
>>> +    items:
>>> +      - const: tx
>>> +      - const: rx
>>> +
>>> +required:
>>> +  - compatible
>>> +  - reg
>>> +  - interrupts
>>> +  - clocks
>>> +  - clock-names
>>> +  - dmas
>>> +  - dma-names
>>> +
>>> +additionalProperties: false
>>> +
>>> +examples:
>>> +  - |
>>> +    #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
>>> +    #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
>>> +    #include <dt-bindings/clock/at91.h>
>>> +    #include <dt-bindings/dma/at91.h>
>>
>> One empty line for readability.
> 
> Ok.
> 
>>
>>> +    aes: aes@...38000 {
>>
>> Generic node name, so "crypto".
> 
> Hm, I'm not convinced why, would you please give more details about this
> requirement? This IP is capable of doing just AES operations, I find it
> generic enough. We use the "aes" name on all our SoCs that have a version
> of this IP, that would be quite a change. So I would prefer to keep the
> "aes" name if possible.
> 

The requirement comes from DT specification.
"The name of a node should be somewhat generic, reflecting the function
of the device and not its precise programming
 model. If appropriate, the name should be one of the following choice"
AES is not generic. AES is specific crypto operation. The spec gives
example - "crypto", so use this one just like others are using. Atmel is
not special in that matter.


Best regards,
Krzysztof