linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Staging: r8188eu: core: alignment should match open parenthesis

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YgI7VtmUtD0nJ2O0@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 8 Feb 2022 10:43:50 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Leonardo Araujo <leonardo.aa88@...il.com>
Cc:     Larry.Finger@...inger.net, phil@...lpotter.co.uk,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staging: r8188eu: core: alignment should match open
 parenthesis

On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 08:48:24PM -0300, Leonardo Araujo wrote:
> Fixed a coding style issue.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Leonardo Araujo <leonardo.aa88@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_ap.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_ap.c b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_ap.c
> index e02dd8e11c95..c7803144355a 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_ap.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_ap.c
> @@ -942,8 +942,8 @@ void bss_cap_update_on_sta_join(struct adapter *padapter, struct sta_info *psta)
>  				pmlmepriv->num_sta_ht_no_gf++;
>  			}
>  			DBG_88E("%s STA %pM - no greenfield, num of non-gf stations %d\n",
> -				   __func__, (psta->hwaddr),
> -				   pmlmepriv->num_sta_ht_no_gf);
> +				__func__, (psta->hwaddr),
> +				pmlmepriv->num_sta_ht_no_gf);
>  		}
>  
>  		if ((ht_capab & IEEE80211_HT_CAP_SUP_WIDTH_20_40) == 0) {
> @@ -952,8 +952,8 @@ void bss_cap_update_on_sta_join(struct adapter *padapter, struct sta_info *psta)
>  				pmlmepriv->num_sta_ht_20mhz++;
>  			}
>  			DBG_88E("%s STA %pM - 20 MHz HT, num of 20MHz HT STAs %d\n",
> -				   __func__, (psta->hwaddr),
> -				   pmlmepriv->num_sta_ht_20mhz);
> +				__func__, (psta->hwaddr),
> +				pmlmepriv->num_sta_ht_20mhz);
>  		}
>  	} else {
>  		if (!psta->no_ht_set) {
> -- 
> 2.29.0
> 
> 

This patch does not apply to my tree at all.  What tree/branch did you
make it against?

Always work against linux-next at the very least, and the subsystem
development branch usually, so that you do not duplicate work that
others have already done.

thanks,

greg k-h