[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8f89131c-41a2-02e4-1427-8a5b1704e0ea@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 16:00:35 +0530
From: Abhishek Sahu <abhsahu@...dia.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: Fix the ACPI power state during runtime resume
On 2/8/2022 12:28 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, February 5, 2022 12:32:19 AM CET Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> [+cc Rafael, hoping for your review :)
>
> +Mika
>
>> Wonder if we should add something like this to MAINTAINERS so you get
>> cc'd on power-related things:
>>
>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>> index ea3e6c914384..3d9a211cad5d 100644
>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>> @@ -15422,6 +15422,7 @@ F: include/linux/pm.h
>> F: include/linux/pm_*
>> F: include/linux/powercap.h
>> F: kernel/configs/nopm.config
>> +K: pci_[a-z_]*power[a-z_]*\(
>
> It seems so, but generally PM patches should be CCed to linux-pm anyway.
>
>>
>> DYNAMIC THERMAL POWER MANAGEMENT (DTPM)
>> M: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...nel.org>
>> ]
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 05:51:07PM +0530, Abhishek Sahu wrote:
>>> Consider the following sequence during PCI device runtime
>>> suspend/resume:
>>>
>>> 1. PCI device goes into runtime suspended state. The PCI state
>>> will be changed to PCI_D0 and then pci_platform_power_transition()
>>> will be called which changes the ACPI state to ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT.
>
> You mean PCI_D3hot I suppose?
>
Yes. It should be PCI_D3hot here.
>>> 2. Parent bridge goes into runtime suspended state. If parent
>>> bridge supports D3cold, then it will change the power state of all its
>>> children to D3cold state and the power will be removed.
>>>
>>> 3. During wake-up time, the bridge will be runtime resumed first
>>> and pci_power_up() will be called for the bridge. Now, the power
>>> supply will be resumed.
>>>
>>> 4. pci_resume_bus() will be called which will internally invoke
>>> pci_restore_standard_config(). pci_update_current_state()
>>> will read PCI_PM_CTRL register and the current_state will be
>>> updated to D0.
>>>
>>> In the above process, at step 4, the ACPI device state will still be
>>> ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT since pci_platform_power_transition() is not being
>>> invoked.
>
> I'm not quite following.
>
> I'm assuming that this description applies to the endpoint device that was
> previously put into D3_hot.
>
Yes. This is applicable for endpoint devices which was previously put
into D3hot.
> Since its current state is D3_hot, it is not D0 (in particular) and the
> pci_set_power_state() in pci_restore_standard_config() should put int into
> D0 proper, including the platform firmware part.
>
The pci_restore_standard_config() for endpoint devices are being called
internally during wake-up of upstream bridge.
pci_power_up(struct pci_dev *dev)
{
...
if (dev->runtime_d3cold) {
/*
* When powering on a bridge from D3cold, the whole hierarchy
* may be powered on into D0uninitialized state, resume them to
* give them a chance to suspend again
*/
pci_resume_bus(dev->subordinate);
}
...
}
For the upstream bridge, the above code will trigger the wake-up of
endpoint devices and then following code will be executed for the
endpoint devices:
pci_update_current_state(struct pci_dev *dev, pci_power_t state)
{
if (platform_pci_get_power_state(dev) == PCI_D3cold ||
!pci_device_is_present(dev)) {
dev->current_state = PCI_D3cold;
} else if (dev->pm_cap) {
u16 pmcsr;
pci_read_config_word(dev, dev->pm_cap + PCI_PM_CTRL, &pmcsr);
dev->current_state = (pmcsr & PCI_PM_CTRL_STATE_MASK);
} else {
dev->current_state = state;
}
}
In the above code, the current_state will be set to D0 for the
endpoint devices since it will go into second block where
it will read the PM_CTRL register.
>>> We need call the pci_platform_power_transition() with state
>>> D0 to change the ACPI state to ACPI_STATE_D0.
>>>
>>> This patch calls pci_power_up() if current power state is D0 inside
>>> pci_restore_standard_config(). This pci_power_up() will change the
>>> ACPI state to ACPI_STATE_D0.
>>>
>>> Following are the steps to confirm:
>>>
>>> Enable the debug prints in acpi_pci_set_power_state()
>>>
>>> 0000:01:00.0 is PCI device and 0000:00:01.0 is parent bridge device
>>>
>>> Before:
>>>
>>> 0000:01:00.0: power state changed by ACPI to D3hot
>>> 0000:00:01.0: power state changed by ACPI to D3cold
>>> 0000:00:01.0: power state changed by ACPI to D0
>>>
>>> After:
>>>
>>> 0000:01:00.0: power state changed by ACPI to D3hot
>>> 0000:00:01.0: power state changed by ACPI to D3cold
>>> 0000:00:01.0: power state changed by ACPI to D0
>>> 0000:01:00.0: power state changed by ACPI to D0
>>>
>>> So with this patch, the PCI device ACPI state is also being
>>> changed to D0.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Abhishek Sahu <abhsahu@...dia.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/pci/pci-driver.c | 14 +++++++++++---
>>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
>>> index 588588cfda48..64e0cca12f16 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-driver.c
>>> @@ -521,14 +521,22 @@ static void pci_device_shutdown(struct device *dev)
>>> */
>>> static int pci_restore_standard_config(struct pci_dev *pci_dev)
>>> {
>>> + int error = 0;
>>> pci_update_current_state(pci_dev, PCI_UNKNOWN);
>>>
>>> if (pci_dev->current_state != PCI_D0) {
>>> - int error = pci_set_power_state(pci_dev, PCI_D0);
>>> - if (error)
>>> - return error;
>>> + error = pci_set_power_state(pci_dev, PCI_D0);
>>> + } else {
>>> + /*
>>> + * The platform power state can still be non-D0, so this is
>>> + * required to change the platform power state to D0.
>>> + */
>
> This really isn't expected to happen.
>
> If the device's power state has been changed to D3hot by ACPI, it is not in D0.
>
> It looks like the state tracking is not working here.
>
The state setting to D0 is happening due to the current logic present in
pci_update_current_state(). If we can fix the logic in
pci_update_current_state() to detect this condition and return state D3hot,
then it should also fix the issue.
Thanks,
Abhishek
>>> + error = pci_power_up(pci_dev);
>>> }
>>>
>>> + if (error)
>>> + return error;
>>> +
>>> pci_restore_state(pci_dev);
>>> pci_pme_restore(pci_dev);
>>> return 0;
>>
>
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists