[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YgJ3QCc/ZPPd9HHx@debian>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 13:59:28 +0000
From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, slade@...dewatkins.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/44] 5.4.178-rc1 review
Hi Greg,
On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 12:06:16PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.178 release.
> There are 44 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 09 Feb 2022 10:37:42 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test:
mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 65 configs -> no new failure
arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 107 configs -> no new failure
arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 2 configs -> no failure
x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 4 configs -> no failure
Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/723
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@...ethink.co.uk>
--
Regards
Sudip
Powered by blists - more mailing lists