lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <YgJ3nF5RGa7VKcwT@debian> Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 14:01:00 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com> To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, slade@...dewatkins.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/74] 5.10.99-rc1 review Hi Greg, On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 12:05:58PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.99 release. > There are 74 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Wed, 09 Feb 2022 10:37:42 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test: mips (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 63 configs -> no new failure arm (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 105 configs -> no new failure arm64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 3 configs -> no failure x86_64 (gcc version 11.2.1 20220121): 4 configs -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/724 [2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/726 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@...ethink.co.uk> -- Regards Sudip
Powered by blists - more mailing lists